THIS MAP IS F***NIG AWESOME. F***ING STARING THIS MAP. GOOD LUCK!

Hi. Mod here

*Note: Gold ones are a must-do. Everything in red are things that look awkward to me (subjective suggestions; you can follow my lead here or not); everything else are rants and minor suggestions to make things look cooler.

>General

1. Everything's fine on the block. To the diffs.

>Beginner

1. 00:37:473 (2) - Remove Finish?

>Difficult

1. This feels like an Insane difficulty for me...
2. 00:58:456 (1) - Unstack this? Don't know why, but I frequently hit this too early and made a miss.

>Expert

1. HP Drain -1?
2. 00:35:908 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern is... uh... a bit hard to read.

...Not really sure if I helped with anything. This beatmap's already great. This is worth a bubble, IMO.

Good luck on the way

Oh, and stars.

Thank You BeatofIke!

Hinsvar wrote: 683k34

Hi. Mod here

*Note: Gold ones are a must-do. Everything in red are things that look awkward to me (subjective suggestions; you can follow my lead here or not); everything else are rants and minor suggestions to make things look cooler.

>General

1. Everything's fine on the block. To the diffs.

>Beginner

1. 00:37:473 (2) - Remove Finish? No change,It follow the music like other diff...

>Difficult

1. This feels like an Insane difficulty for me... Because the BPM
2. 00:58:456 (1) - Unstack this? Don't know why, but I frequently hit this too early and made a miss. Ok~

>Expert

1. HP Drain -1? No change because [Difficult] is use HP5.
2. 00:35:908 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern is... uh... a bit hard to read. I think player can read it If they can play [Difficult] well.

...Not really sure if I helped with anything. This beatmap's already great. This is worth a bubble, IMO.

Good luck on the way

Oh, and stars. Thank!

Thank for mod&Star*2!

hihi 7odoa ~

From modding queue

Beginner
fine~

Basic
01:16:508 (1) - new combo here , I like 1,2 1,2,3 1,3 and it's better for me :3
01:17:326 (1) - I think it's better to new combo this and remove new combo next note because from their position and sound

Difficult
00:29:778 (1) - If you remove new combo here and add next note instead , I think next set of combo 1-5 will fit to thier position (half down)

Expert
01:33:769 (1) - change this to repeat slider please ? from previous run , I think people can't stop his run by this anti jump , so using repeat slider at this point would be better.


Challenge
I suggest you to -1 HP drain , it's really hard to in last part from this hp drain and bpm ...
00:35:517 (3) - this can confuse people from last 00:34:734 (3) - I think this slider need to be moved to other position or move its tail
00:51:365 (7) - this slider need to be new combo from decreasing slider velocity and because this slider placed near other slider but speed doesn't match with them
01:19:915 (2) - why don't use slow slider same as previous point like this ? 01:17:053 (3) - I think this single note cut your flow from its sound , slider will fit it more than this
01:20:463 (2) - ^
01:21:690 (1) - use 1/6 snap divisor, end this slider at 01:22:053 (you use 1/4 and it doesn't match with sound I heard from 25% playback)
01:31:923 (1) - nazi , move this slider's tail to x:278 y:211 this will be stacked completely with 01:31:115 (2) -


sorry for late modding =_=''


Star and Good luck for ranking !

Frostmourne wrote: 4k533o

hihi 7odoa ~

From modding queue

Beginner
fine~

Basic
01:16:508 (1) - new combo here , I like 1,2 1,2,3 1,3 and it's better for me :3 Ok~
01:17:326 (1) - I think it's better to new combo this and remove new combo next note because from their position and sound Ok~

Difficult
00:29:778 (1) - If you remove new combo here and add next note instead , I think next set of combo 1-5 will fit to thier position (half down) Currently is fine...

Expert
01:33:769 (1) - change this to repeat slider please ? from previous run , I think people can't stop his run by this anti jump , so using repeat slider at this point would be better. Ok~


Challenge
I suggest you to -1 HP drain , it's really hard to in last part from this hp drain and bpm ... HP6 not fit this song,and this is Challenge diff,so I do not want player easy to ...
00:35:517 (3) - this can confuse people from last 00:34:734 (3) - I think this slider need to be moved to other position or move its tail
Okay...
00:51:365 (7) - this slider need to be new combo from decreasing slider velocity and because this slider placed near other slider but speed doesn't match with them Changed Sider Shape.
01:19:915 (2) - why don't use slow slider same as previous point like this ? 01:17:053 (3) - I think this single note cut your flow from its sound , slider will fit it more than this Good idea,Fixed!
01:20:463 (2) - ^ ^
01:21:690 (1) - use 1/6 snap divisor, end this slider at 01:22:053 (you use 1/4 and it doesn't match with sound I heard from 25% playback) Fixed,Thank you for point out!
01:31:923 (1) - nazi , move this slider's tail to x:278 y:211 this will be stacked completely with 01:31:115 (2) - Ok~


sorry for late modding =_=''


Star and Good luck for ranking !

Thank You for Useful mod & Star!

1. I removed many useless green line And Changed Kiai time.

from my queue

[General]
timing不是每个难度都一样，红线太多了我懒得仔细看了，自己看看吧0.0
可能因为timing的关系，kiai也不一样了，可以试试弄一样来

[Beginner]
01:21:008 (4,5) - 可以考虑换成slider，这个节奏对新人来说太难读了

[Basic]
AR+1？
00:58:045 (2,3) - 换成slider？

[Difficult]
fine

[Expert]
01:22:237 (1,2,3,4,5) - 开25%仔细听的话，这里其实是1/4的4连
01:36:887 (1,2) - 这两个1.5x真心没必要。。

[Challenge]
AR+1？
01:22:237 (1,2,3,4,5) - same
01:36:887 (1,2) - same

太鬼畜了QAQ
图虽然没啥问题，不过这难度，我不知道能rank不。。

wcx19911123 wrote: 2h2g3d

from my queue

[General]
timing不是每个难度都一样，红线太多了我懒得仔细看了，自己看看吧0.0
可能因为timing的关系，kiai也不一样了，可以试试弄一样来 Leorda都提出了,一難度的红线共有57條,如果要找出來的話,不知道要花上多少時間... (有工具便好了)

[Beginner]
01:21:008 (4,5) - 可以考虑换成slide，这个节奏对新人来说太难读了 有心無力,换成slider的話會是55BPM slider...

[Basic]
AR+1？ 在50BPM 的地方太快了
00:58:045 (2,3) - 换成slider？ 同上

[Difficult]
fine

[Expert]
01:22:237 (1,2,3,4,5) - 开25%仔细听的话，这里其实是1/4的4连 如果有留意IIDX的譜面的話,這裏是5连打
01:36:887 (1,2) - 这两个1.5x真心没必要。。 我看看他人的意見....

[Challenge]
AR+1？ 在50BPM 的地方太快了...
01:22:237 (1,2,3,4,5) - same 同上
01:36:887 (1,2) - same 同上

太鬼畜了QAQ
图虽然没啥问题，不过这难度，我不知道能rank不。。 我都不知道...

看來要ranked便需要最少8 page的post了
果然容昜的圖是較容昜Ranked

Thank for Wcx for Mod And Star icon!~

Hi Nymph here and request from my queue.

[General]
红线错在这了 CHANLLENGE难度和其他难度不同 改成和其他难度一样吧




所以KIAI的不同也是差在那了 统一弄一下~


[Challenge]
Beatmap design/suggestion
基本没什么好提的 只有：...........
00:13:385 (4) - 这个slider减速1PC巨突然……完全反应不过来 NC一下提示下？
00:17:749 (4) - ^也是。。
00:51:365 (7) -
00:54:773 (4) -
00:58:045 (3) -
01:10:783 (3) -
01:13:101 (4) -
01:14:327 (6) -
01:15:145 (3) -
01:16:235 (4) -
01:17:053 (3) -
01:17:462 (4) -
01:18:143 (6) -
01:25:612 (4) -
01:29:477 (4) -
…………我感觉这歌就让我头脑一片混乱 我就完全不能判断哪个是减速slider了 如果可以的话 我倒真想推荐你单独用一个combo colour来标记每个减速的slider……弄个灰色什么的…………能让读图更容易一些..要不真是彻底懵了

图本身没问题……关键我觉得这map要bubble得找有魄力的MAT或者BAT.....

以上TAT

Nymph wrote: 2w2f1l

Hi Nymph here and request from my queue.

[General]
红线错在这了 CHANLLENGE难度和其他难度不同 改成和其他难度一样吧
[attachment=1:72a5e]1111.png[/attachment:72a5e]
[attachment=0:72a5e]1111111111.png[/attachment:72a5e]


所以KIAI的不同也是差在那了 统一弄一下~ FIXED,十分感謝!


[Challenge]
Beatmap design/suggestion
基本没什么好提的 只有：...........
00:13:385 (4) - 这个slider减速1PC巨突然……完全反应不过来 NC一下提示下？
00:17:749 (4) - ^也是。。
00:51:365 (7) -
00:54:773 (4) -
00:58:045 (3) -
01:10:783 (3) -
01:13:101 (4) -
01:14:327 (6) -
01:15:145 (3) -
01:16:235 (4) -
01:17:053 (3) -
01:17:462 (4) -
01:18:143 (6) -
01:25:612 (4) -
01:29:477 (4) -
…………我感觉这歌就让我头脑一片混乱 我就完全不能判断哪个是减速slider了 如果可以的话 我倒真想推荐你单独用一个combo colour来标记每个减速的slider……弄个灰色什么的…………能让读图更容易一些..要不真是彻底懵了
這曲在IIDX和DDR都是無法判断哪裏減速,玩家只能記下哪裏减速,不然便無法了(Beatmania IIDX原影片)
因上的原因,所以我不打算改,加上不太喜歡大量NC.
不能判断减速是這圖的難度所在,因為這是[Challenge]

图本身没问题……关键我觉得这map要bubble得找有魄力的MAT或者BAT..... 這個我試試找多個MAT/Modder吧...

以上TAT

Thank You Nymph for Mod!

Red line Fixed!

request from All map will be modded

01:30:077 - 非人領域，開始 ! 要毀滅世界了啊 OAQ01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz

Expert 30156q

1. 這星數騙太大orz，我能想像玩家第一次玩的表情會是「OAO」
2. 01:28:157 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 超討厭的part...orz
3. 01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol
   以上是我的心得:3

Difficult 676ho

1. 總覺得難度名"Hyper"好點，因為beginner和expert，總合起來念得比較順xD
2. 這圖找BAT的話絕對不能找Odaril

Basic 1y3v4z

1. Basic啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊(意義不明

Beginner 82hl

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - 我覺得把這兩個note換成slider比較好，以突然轉折的音來說，改成這樣對新手來的簡單許多

恩，這圖真的滿好
只是放的某些跳讓圖打起來不是那麼的順
我期待這圖能ranked
玩家反應一定很大xD
加油gogo ~
S.T.A.R !!

抱歉post兩次
由於代碼還有系統問題(它不給Edit...)
排版變得很奇怪希望別介意OAQ

DarknessAngel wrote: 635qj

抱歉post兩次
由於代碼還有系統問題(它不給Edit...)
排版變得很奇怪希望別介意OAQ

ok~

DarknessAngel wrote: 635qj

request from All map will be modded

Challenge


我瞎了，對於這難度我不知道該如何評價才好，不科學啊 這有"孤高の創世"的難度~
00:13:385 (4) - 真心認為像這種變速很多的長條理應給它個NC，這是對玩家的一種照顧，比較好判斷而且有強調這part的效果
另外我看了你上一篇的回應，這圖已經非常難了(能的我想絕對很少)，在判斷上也增加難度也只是讓玩家徒增困擾而已
沒比較好，反而更差:< → 原作的譜面都是沒有暗示任何BPM變化 ,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...
01:12:009 (1) - 你看看你，可以給note加NC卻不給長條，你偏心 ! I removed this NC...
嘛，說那麼多你還是沒改的話，那盒子裡的東西就無視吧 ~
00:15:703 (1,2,3,4) - 這種其實就跟note組成的一直線差不多，因為呈現一個弧的關係大多數人打這種pattern多半會用鼠標"滑"過去，然而這樣又非常容易斷，像我就挺討厭這種排法的，不舒服啊lol 這是間距的難度吧~
box (click to toggle)
00:17:749 (4) - NC個，理由你知道
00:51:365 (7) - ^
00:54:773 (4) - ^
00:58:045 (3) - ^
01:10:783 (3) - ^
01:13:101 (4) - 長條說：「請給我NC吧QQ。」
01:14:327 (6) - ^
01:16:235 (4) - ^
01:16:644 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這part只有(3)需要NC而已
01:25:612 (4) - NC
01:29:477 (4) - NC 先不改,看看其他Modder的意見~


01:30:077 - 非人領域，開始 ! 要毀滅世界了啊 OAQ
01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...


Expert


這星數騙太大orz，我能想像玩家第一次玩的表情會是「OAO」 這為何4.5*
01:28:157 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 超討厭的part...orz ...
01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol:arrow: 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...
以上是我的心得:3



Difficult


總覺得難度名"Hyper"好點，因為beginner和expert，總合起來念得比較順xD 這是DDRSN2的難度名稱,不可任意更改.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dance_Danc ... Difficulty)

這圖找BAT的話絕對不能找Odaril 他一定說:這一定不是hard的難度!



Basic


Basic啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊(意義不明



Beginner


01:21:008 (4,5) - 我覺得把這兩個note換成slider比較好，以突然轉折的音來說，改成這樣對新手來的簡單許多 這裏BPM=55 Orz...



恩，這圖真的滿好
只是放的某些跳讓圖打起來不是那麼的順
我期待這圖能ranked
玩家反應一定很大xD
加油gogo ~
S.T.A.R !! 十分感謝!

Thank You DarknessAngel for Mod&Star!

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol:arrow: 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...

由於上面是綠色字所以只是吐槽用啦，沒要你改lol

Edit : 第一次mod沒得到KD，我太遜了T.T
Edit 2 : 欸？我想說你是因為什麼都沒改所以沒給，原來是忘了ww

DarknessAngel wrote: 635qj

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol:arrow: 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...

由於上面是綠色字所以只是吐槽用啦，沒要你改lol

不是,我都認為這兩個slider有一點過分,才要考慮應否修改...

放心吧,我没有修改!

EDIT:第一次接你的mod忘了給KD,我記性太差了

Pretty sure using red timing sections merely to slow down sliders isn't rankable anymore, even if it is from the official timing.

Charles445 wrote: 252k60

Pretty sure using red timing sections merely to slow down sliders isn't rankable anymore, even if it is from the official timing.

hmm,Maybe okay for this song?
Because when I map Pluto Relinquish,I use BPM 100-200-400-800

早安 7odoa又一張觸圖QAQ 題外話早兩天偷偷加了好友

[General]

Offset: 104.821782178218 嗯......?

[Beginner]

00:13:931 (1,2,3,4) - 這部份Timing確定沒錯?? 聽下去怪怪的，試試(1)在00:15:021結束，(2)搬到00:15:567，(3)搬到00:16:112，(4)提前從00:17:203開始
01:21:008 (4,5) - Slider代替，新手哪裡能應付這種突然加速lol

[Basic]

00:18:496 - Useless inherited point
00:20:517 (1) - 第三點向左移動1格

[Difficult]

00:09:704 (1) - 對比前面的速度，這個加速實在很突然....有沒有辦法放個SB之類?
00:29:653 (4) - 之面習慣了1/1，這裡突然有個1/2有點不順手，看看要不要刪掉，或者放在前面Slider的下方順著去

[Expert]

okay

[Challenge]

我是覺得要不要AR10 後面270Bpm感覺有點亂orz

就這樣囉~

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
If you would like, you can delete all your bookmarks to decrease the size of your .osz file by a little since you won't be needing them by the time this gets put on the server.
You do not need the timing points at:
00:13:385
00:13:931
00:14:067
00:17:749
00:22:604
00:51:365
00:54:773
00:58:045
01:10:783
01:11:056
01:11:737
01:12:419
01:13:100
01:13:372
01:14:327
01:14:599
01:15:145
01:15:554
01:16:235
01:16:507
01:17:053
01:17:325
01:17:871
01:18:143
01:18:415
01:18:552
01:18:961
01:19:915
01:20:327
01:20:872
01:21:008
01:21:690
01:25:612
01:29:477
01:33:769
01:34:666
01:36:443

That's a lot of timing points you used there: at first I thought you were trying to stay on rhythm and to try to start each downbeat at the right place, but then I looked at your Challenge difficulty and realized that you were using the Timing points to manipulate your slider velocity, which is unfortunately UNRANKABLE. Let's delete these and fix your sliders before I come back to this. Feel free to PM me when that's fixed.

In addition, you also have inconsistent Kiai Times. You may want to fix those as well.

Good luck :3

those wrote: 2f131h

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
If you would like, you can delete all your bookmarks to decrease the size of your .osz file by a little since you won't be needing them by the time this gets put on the server.
You do not need the timing points at:
00:13:385
00:13:931
00:14:067
00:17:749
00:22:604
00:51:365
00:54:773
00:58:045
01:10:783
01:11:056
01:11:737
01:12:419
01:13:100
01:13:372
01:14:327
01:14:599
01:15:145
01:15:554
01:16:235
01:16:507
01:17:053
01:17:325
01:17:871
01:18:143
01:18:415
01:18:552
01:18:961
01:19:915
01:20:327
01:20:872
01:21:008
01:21:690
01:25:612
01:29:477
01:33:769
01:34:666
01:36:443

That's a lot of timing points you used there: at first I thought you were trying to stay on rhythm and to try to start each downbeat at the right place, but then I looked at your Challenge difficulty and realized that you were using the Timing points to manipulate your slider velocity, which is unfortunately UNRANKABLE. Let's delete these and fix your sliders before I come back to this. Feel free to PM me when that's fixed.

In addition, you also have inconsistent Kiai Times. You may want to fix those as well.

Good luck :3

You are wrong,those Timing points is presence in this song. Beatmania IIDX's Pluto Video(Look at the BPM change at bottom)

About Kiai Times,I've checked all diff and found no problem.

Thank You for check~

It doesn't matter whether they are present in the official music. In a map you cannot manipulate slider velocity with Timing Points if you want your map ranked.

I just follow official timing,so I think it is fine and no change.
I don't want to manipulate slider velocity with Timing Points,It is the song make me to do it.
This need more comment...

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

I just follow official timing,so I think it is fine.
I don't want to manipulate slider velocity with Timing Points,It is the song make me to do it.
This need more comment...

You are manipulating slider velocity with Timing Points, and here's a quick way to fix it.
Right now, you have instances of 220 and 55 bpm. To fix that, recalling the lowest sv multipler is x0.5, set the instances of 55 bpm to x0.5 sv, and set the instances of 220 bpm to x2.0 sv. Keep in mind you will need to fix your general sliver velocity by doing so.

I know,but it will become 100~135BPM in this song...
The problem is some BPM have completely different slider speed,It look more strange...
Also I can't use SV multipler3.5x for this to Slider ([Challenge] 01:36:887 (1,2))
And this song is no 100~135BPM,only 50~270.

Sorry but I think currently is the best setting for this song.
If this is unrankable,I will talk to MAT/BAT.

Thank you those!~

Sorry for my poor english...

This map is fantastic. And I love the way BPM is manipulated.
In my honest opinion, Slider velocities could be manipulated, they give a SO nice effect!
You're one of my favourite mappers, 7odoa

Thank You!~

sexy beatmap

first try

AWESOME MAP good job

OH GOD AWESOME MAP one of the best map i've ever seen
but a little question:

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

No need Taiko diff for this song...

why?

dialgadu77 wrote: 304e2k

OH GOD AWESOME MAP one of the best map i've ever seen
but a little question:

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

No need Taiko diff for this song...

why?

Because this song have too many BPM change,
Ex: 01:09:146 ~ 01:21:690
When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

Many taiko mapper asked me for taiko diff...

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

Because this song have too many BPM change,
Ex: 01:09:146 ~ 01:21:690
When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

I like SV x4.

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

You just need to set inherited points to multiply the sv.

those wrote: 2f131h

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

You just need to set inherited points to multiply the sv.

I can multiply SV without inherithed points. (max: SV x4 with manual editing)
EDIT: and I can modify inherited points like you said, this is a good idea.

EDIT 2: OH GOD I MAPPED A TAIKO (am i crazy?) this is not unreadable (lol 666 combo)

Taiko BG:


: Black Hole - Pluto (7odoa) [Ex's Taiko Oni].osu

Rule wrote: 6d473t

Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

I don't know this is rankable or not,but if I accept your taiko diff,I'll accept Verdi's and Ono's taiko diff too.(They are asked me taiko diff in before)
Anyway,I can put this diff on Creator's Words now if you want~

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

Rule wrote: 6d473t

Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

I don't know this is rankable or not,but if I accept your taiko diff,I'll accept Verdi's and Ono's taiko diff too.(They are asked me taiko diff in before)
Anyway,I can put this diff on Creator's Words now if you want~

Ok. If you want, I can modify my Taiko diff for this:
Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor
'cause this is possible

from M4M queue
以及我鬼畜圖mod不能.orz
給張不鬼畜的可以嗎/.\

karenying wrote: 1h6fc

from M4M queue
以及我鬼畜圖mod不能.orz
給張不鬼畜的可以嗎/.\

當然可以,但我目前沒有其他圖要mod.
我先把Ticket留着,有圖要mod的話先再PM你吧~ :b

Updated Taiko for removing manual editing.
Now you can add this in Creator's Words.

EDIT: Thanks a lot!

: Black Hole - Pluto (7odoa) [Ex's Taiko Oni] (with Taiko BG).zip

顺道提一下作曲是NAOKI MAEDA
加到tag里到时候别人找NAOKI的曲子会方便点

from queue:
基本没什么可挑的，图排版流畅，节奏也一流。@_@
rating: A-

Hello, 7odoa! I really love the map and the song choice.

General

1. Looks good.

Beginner

1. 00:25:733 (4,1) - The pattern you have with these two sliders is pretty odd looking in my opinion. Try something like this that's more intuitive and better looking. They also blanket eachother very nicely.
2. 01:11:056 (2) - This slider is pretty odd looking if you ask me.
3. 01:36:443 (4) - Spacing between the previous slider and this note is a bit too large.

Basic

1. 00:11:885 (1) - Put the whistle on the end of this slider rather than the reverse to follow your whistle pattern.
2. 00:16:248 (1) - ^
3. 00:33:560 - You should add a note here because of the fact that there's an audible beat at this point. It also flows well. I suggest arranging it like this and adding a NC at 00:34:343 (5) to shorten up the combo.
4. 01:23:737 (4) - Move this up two grids to be symmetrical with the previous slider.

Difficult

1. 00:22:995 (1) - Stack this on the bottom of the previous stream.
2. 00:34:734 (2,4) - Make it so that these don't overlap.

Expert

1. Looks good to me.

Challenge

1. Holy crap. This difficulty is intense.
2. 00:13:385 (4) - Put a new combo on this slider and all other slowdown sliders like it.

Good luck!

Jacob wrote: 6138n

Hello, 7odoa! I really love the map and the song choice.

General

1. Looks good.

Beginner

1. 00:25:733 (4,1) - The pattern you have with these two sliders is pretty odd looking in my opinion. Try something like this that's more intuitive and better looking. They also blanket eachother very nicely.//It's fine to me
2. 01:11:056 (2) - This slider is pretty odd looking if you ask me.//Changed
3. 01:36:443 (4) - Spacing between the previous slider and this note is a bit too large.//Fixed

Basic

1. 00:11:885 (1) - Put the whistle on the end of this slider rather than the reverse to follow your whistle pattern.//No change
2. 00:16:248 (1) - ^//No change
3. 00:33:560 - You should add a note here because of the fact that there's an audible beat at this point. It also flows well. I suggest arranging it like this and adding a NC at 00:34:343 (5) to shorten up the combo.//OK
4. 01:23:737 (4) - Move this up two grids to be symmetrical with the previous slider.//...

Difficult

1. 00:22:995 (1) - Stack this on the bottom of the previous stream.//No change
2. 00:34:734 (2,4) - Make it so that these don't overlap.//I think it is fine...

Expert

1. Looks good to me.

Challenge

1. Holy crap. This difficulty is intense.
2. 00:13:385 (4) - Put a new combo on this slider and all other slowdown sliders like it.//OK,I add new combo colors for Slowdown.

Good luck!

Thank for Mod

-Changed BG!

I checked your map for my queue ~

Really nice map and cool music ~ i can't find anything issue ~

So take you a cool bubble ><

做好毀滅世界的準備了
話說我覺得Expert比Challenge打起來更順
然後Expert的星數依然令人費解
期待rank啊
gogogo ~

OMFGBUBBLED

Oh my god o.o

From my modding queue. Sorry for taking long time :<

[Difficult]

1. 01:37:554 (1,2,3) - This is a hard diff. So please follow the consistent distance spacing here.

[Basic]

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - Since it's too hard for beginner to read the timing, change these notes to a slider.

Please tell me your thought.

About red timing sections. I'll ask other about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.

Suzully wrote: 423y2t

From my modding queue. Sorry for taking long time :< <<Never mind~

[Difficult]

1. 01:37:554 (1,2,3) - This is a hard diff. So please follow the consistent distance spacing here.<<Ok~

[Basic]

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - Since it's too hard for beginner to read the timing, change these notes to a slider.<<I can't change it to slider,because the slider is too slow.

Please tell me your thought.

About red timing sections. I'll ask other about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.<<Okay,I think It is fine because it is from the official timing~

Thank!~

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

Suzully wrote: 423y2t

About red timing sections. I'll ask other about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.<<Okay,I think It is fine because it is from the official timing~

Even if this was true, there is absolutely no indication whatsoever that the slider speed changes, which makes it unacceptable. I can understand for some slow sections, but many others are just you adding them for the sake of changing slider speeds, which is unrankable. Please use this timing - I tried not to remove any of your green lines, forgive me if I did:

104,300,4,2,1,95,1,0
9704,272.727272727273,4,1,2,60,1,0
18431,260.869565217391,4,1,1,70,1,1
22539,-100,4,2,1,95,0,1
22800,-100,4,1,1,70,0,0
22995,-100,4,1,1,70,0,1
26778,250,6,1,1,70,1,0
32778,260.869565217391,6,1,1,70,1,1
41438,300,4,1,2,60,1,0
48638,272.727272727273,4,1,1,70,1,0
58456,300,4,1,1,70,1,0
59056,-100,4,1,1,63,0,0
59656,-100,4,1,1,56,0,0
60256,-100,4,1,1,49,0,0
63106,-100,4,2,2,95,0,0
68056,272.727272727273,4,1,1,80,1,0
80260,-100,4,1,1,85,0,0
80806,-100,4,1,1,90,0,0
81351,-100,4,1,1,95,0,0
81624,-100,4,2,1,90,0,0
82237,250,4,1,2,65,1,0
90077,230.769230769231,4,1,1,75,1,1
93711,-100,4,2,1,95,0,1
94111,-100,4,1,1,80,0,1
94666,222.222222222222,4,1,1,80,1,1
95499,-100,4,1,1,85,0,1
96443,222.222222222222,5,1,1,85,1,1
96831,-66.6666666666667,5,1,1,85,0,1
97220,-100,5,1,1,85,0,0
97331,-100,5,1,1,70,0,0

I liked what you did with the slows because it fits and makes sense, but the how the slows are made is unrankable. I'll gladly help you go through your map to find replacements for them and fix the patterns ! me as soon as you can - search "Shiro" on IRC if I'm not online so we can work through this and get your map rebubbled asap !

As what Odaril wrote, we cannot allow these red timing sections.
Fix them and call me back. I'll rebubble after rechecking.

Sorry,I don't want to use this timing for some reason:

1. I want to keep BPM:50~270,not BPM:200~270(as I said before,it is from the official timing)
2. If I use this timing,then I must Re-map those slow part.
3. I think using BPM:50x4=200 for slow part is not fit.

Sorry about that.

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

Twilight Sparkle wrote: 2847r

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

Thank You!~

No BAT going to rank this? orz...

Well, no, I mean two BATs plainly told you what's going on. If a BAT were to rank this now it'd be directly defying the other two.

Here's my opinion on it.

I think the difficulties are FUN AS HELL. Challenge is epic, and Expert is even better. The slowdowns in Challenge, however, do not add to the fun.
While you did a somewhat okay job at indicating their speeds with white combo colors, that sort of speed change hasn't been rankable for a very long time.

Rules wrote: 3n6o1f

我在mod這張圖的時候就該說的...orz
沒辦法，要是你不改的話就不能ranked ;_;

DarknessAngel wrote: 635qj

Rules wrote: 3n6o1f

我在mod這張圖的時候就該說的...orz
沒辦法，要是你不改的話就不能ranked ;_;

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...
rank不了便算吧,而且我不只是想這張圖rank~
(新圖求MOD XD)

I tired to get it ranked...

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...
rank不了便算吧,而且我不只是想這張圖rank~
(新圖求MOD XD)

I tired to get it ranked...

我個人很想看到這圖上架的說T.T
慢滑條的確很有梗，可是不用紅線就沒辦法達成...(綠線最少0.5倍速度還是快了些..)
還是說改成像Expert那樣1/1重疊？
雖說捨棄變慢的梗讓人不爽但是至少能ranked ;w;

話說在這裡求MOD是哪招xD
sry我最近不接req =3=

DarknessAngel wrote: 635qj

我個人很想看到這圖上架的說T.T<-我都是.
慢滑條的確很有梗，可是不用紅線就沒辦法達成...(綠線最少0.5倍速度還是快了些..)<-只是用的原作的timing而已,不是我想出來的梗.
還是說改成像Expert那樣1/1重疊？<2個難度用同一種寫法太沒有新意了
雖說捨棄變慢的梗讓人不爽但是至少能ranked ;w;<-以圖的質量為先,改了會令我對圖的質量不滿意,我不想rank了一些陣mapper自己都不滿意的圖

話說在這裡求MOD是哪招xD
sry我最近不接req =3=<不要緊,只是宣傳一下而已~

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...

GOOD IDEAL

其實有方法令BPM不用變都可以做到這效果..不用REMAP...

把sv轉做1.35 1.0part轉2.0 bpm 慢part轉0.5試試?

Suzully wrote: 423y2t

About red timing sections. I'll ask other about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.

I'm in.

I gotta tell you, 7odoa, if those unrankable BPMs were all 50 and it would have been timed with that, I'd say no to all those people saying that it's unrankable.
But, I'm sorry, this is really unrankable.
As those said, there are timing sections not needed at all, since they're just the same BPMs, divided by 4

those wrote: 2f131h

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
If you would like, you can delete all your bookmarks to decrease the size of your .osz file by a little since you won't be needing them by the time this gets put on the server.
You do not need the timing points at:
00:13:385
00:13:931
00:14:067
00:17:749
00:22:604
00:51:365
00:54:773
00:58:045
01:10:783
01:11:056
01:11:737
01:12:419
01:13:100
01:13:372
01:14:327
01:14:599
01:15:145
01:15:554
01:16:235
01:16:507
01:17:053
01:17:325
01:17:871
01:18:143
01:18:415
01:18:552
01:18:961
01:19:915
01:20:327
01:20:872
01:21:008
01:21:690
01:25:612
01:29:477
01:33:769
01:34:666
01:36:443

That's a lot of timing points you used there: at first I thought you were trying to stay on rhythm and to try to start each downbeat at the right place, but then I looked at your Challenge difficulty and realized that you were using the Timing points to manipulate your slider velocity, which is unfortunately UNRANKABLE. Let's delete these and fix your sliders before I come back to this. Feel free to PM me when that's fixed.

In addition, you also have inconsistent Kiai Times. You may want to fix those as well.

Good luck :3

I know something that can replace the unrankable sliders, but you gotta move the objects when done, if needed.
Replace those white sliders by circles, but use a VERY LOW distance snapping multiplier (even 0.0 works imo) and you can use the white combo for them. If the idea is bad, I have no other idea.

Before the post ends...
01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

You gotta do something about this, pal. Best of luck~

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

Twilight Sparkle wrote: 2847r

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

Thank You!~

No BAT going to rank this? orz...

No, because you're refusing to fix something that's unrankable and are ignoring three BATs (and even more) by doing so. I offered you the correct timing, and proposed to help you find a replacement, but you didn't even consider my post.

7odoa, please PM me when you've decided to be reasonable so I can unnuke this and help with the map.

nold_1702 wrote: c162z

把sv轉做1.35 1.0part轉2.0 bpm 慢part轉0.5試試?

好吧,我試試~

Baka Tenshi wrote: 58r4h

01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

It's fine,just like Expert.

BPM:50~270 Changed to 100~135

It's no problem for now?

Hi.

I can confirm that the timing has been changed.
However, watch out for broken sliders. For example, in the Expert difficulty, 00:22:995 (1) -
while I'm at it, 01:21:556 (1,1) - (expert diff) this is quite a huge jump, and very surprising, given that the objects are a whole screen away from each other.

I'm happy to unnuke this - good luck on getting this ranked !

Shiro wrote: 47b

Hi.

I can confirm that the timing has been changed.
However, watch out for broken sliders. For example, in the Expert difficulty, 00:22:995 (1) -
while I'm at it, 01:21:556 (1,1) - (expert diff) this is quite a huge jump, and very surprising, given that the objects are a whole screen away from each other.

I'm happy to unnuke this - good luck on getting this ranked !

Fixed~

Thank you for understanding.
I'm glad that I can get a bubble back now. But there is still a few issues.

[Beginner]

1. 01:17:465 (3,1) - Incorrect spacing.
2. 01:30:077 (1,3) - Oh...

Suzully wrote: 423y2t

Thank you for understanding.
I'm glad that I can get a bubble back now. But there is still a few issues.

[Beginner]

1. 01:17:465 (3,1) - Incorrect spacing.<-Fixed
2. 01:30:077 (1,3) - Oh...<-Fixed......

Thank~

Also removed some tick sound on [Challenge].

All stuff seem fine now.
Rebubbled!

go go go go go!

don't know I assume or not but it feels harder than before about hp drain and stuff in challange <3

why today this map is not being ranked T.T

7odoa wrote: 6w3d4y

Baka Tenshi wrote: 58r4h

01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

It's fine,just like Expert.

BPM:50~270 Changed to 100~135

It's no problem for now?

Just saying: I did that with Do I Smile?, but the result will have to be extremely odd for the unrankable map to be rankable.
260~6400 --> 184~360
So don't worry about the timing, at least it may be RANKABLE.

C'mon why does it take sooo long

Yo

[General]
Tick rate 4 to all difficulties since you have the BPM halved. I'd recommend you silence key ticks during the beginning and other quieter parts of the song.

[Easy]
01:15:556 (1,2,3) - This part is pretty trick for an easy. You might want to simplify with it longer sliders like you've used before.

[Basic]
This is hardly what I would call a Basic. Call it Standard or Normal.

[Difficult]
00:15:704 (4) - I'm not sure what this note is mapped to, but it is weird to play.
00:32:778 (1) - Something that's really bugging me about this section is that you chose to do a slider -> circle -? slider -> circle progression when the music is grouped in fours. You're essentially grouping things in threes with this type of pattern and it's really really difficult to play it naturally. I recommend you rethink this part.
01:27:917 (2,1) - This jump is egg a big pain too due to the direction change.

[Challenge]
01:26:237 (1) - I didn't like how this was the sole stacked note after a slow slider.

Good stuff. Mainly worried about the simplification of the Easy.

Please Rank!

rrtyui wrote: 4r1w1a

Please Rank it !

Garven wrote: 3w455y

Yo

[General]
Tick rate 4 to all difficulties since you have the BPM halved. I'd recommend you silence key ticks during the beginning and other quieter parts of the song.
Ok~

[Easy]
01:15:556 (1,2,3) - This part is pretty trick for an easy. You might want to simplify with it longer sliders like you've used before.
I have re-map this part,it is hard to map...

[Basic]
This is hardly what I would call a Basic. Call it Standard or Normal.
It is DDRSN2's Diff Name,Basic=Normal

[Difficult]
00:15:704 (4) - I'm not sure what this note is mapped to, but it is weird to play.
Fixed
00:32:778 (1) - Something that's really bugging me about this section is that you chose to do a slider -> circle -? slider -> circle progression when the music is grouped in fours. You're essentially grouping things in threes with this type of pattern and it's really really difficult to play it naturally. I recommend you rethink this part.
[Expert]No changed because it's not very hard in this diff...
01:27:917 (2,1) - This jump is egg a big pain too due to the direction change.
Changed some.

[Challenge]
01:26:237 (1) - I didn't like how this was the sole stacked note after a slow slider.
Fixed

Good stuff. Mainly worried about the simplification of the Easy.

Thank!~

[General]

1. 01:37:220 - unsnapped KIAI section.

[Challenge]

1. 01:34:000 (2) - for consistence, new combo this instead of the note next.

~

Colin Hou wrote: 1v5j56

[General]

1. 01:37:220 - unsnapped KIAI section.

[Challenge]

1. 01:34:000 (2) - for consistence, new combo this instead of the note next.

~

All Fixed,Thank~

[Challenge]

1. make sure all white combo color is used properly after 01:35:111

Colin Hou wrote: 1v5j56

[Challenge]

1. make sure all white combo color is used properly after 01:35:111

Fixed~

re-bubbled

Ranked!

Finally Ranked ~!

Cool map ><

Finally.

Congratz

RANKED HURRMUYGURRRDDD

Sweet Congrats!

very nice... youve been copying those speed at DDR

what is this crap? o_o

congrats, i love this song xD

FCKYEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

I think I need to have a break from this game.

Congratulations!!

这个好>_>

Nice !!

Ranked!? Are you kidding

T o u c h e wrote: 26y2u

Ranked!? Are you kidding

No he's not. The map is rankable already so why not?

And 7odoa congrats for the rank!
/me tries to go to the top 40 before the NoFail records get out of the top 50

Good

why not Appoverd??

at least rainbow dash is playable