Pokie wrote: 4yz25

^_^ irc modded, log

SPOILER

14:01 Pokie: 00:42:179 (2,3) - Easy, æšæšį¯åĨ? /_\ å踊éŧåčææäēē (éįļææ°åéŊįĄäšč¸Šä¸­
14:01 Pokie: 00:45:903 (3) - åĸį¨Žoverlap EasyåĨŊäŧŧååž
14:02 nold_1702: .
14:02 nold_1702: wait
14:03 Pokie: 01:30:593 (1) - åĸåäŋåĒčĻčˇčŋåéĸåå finish?
14:03 Pokie: 01:27:282 (1) - <čˇåĸå
14:04 Pokie: 02:01:214 (2) - æĸslideråŠéåäŋåĨŊå°į¨ąäŊåįäē
14:05 Pokie: 02:45:076 (1) - æéˇå°02:45:903 -åĸåäŊ
14:06 nold_1702: 1.yes 2.äŋæļåŠ0.0... 3.åįĨflask...äŊäŋæéŊfixä¸ 4.okay 5.yea -v-
14:06 Pokie: overlapåäŋåĨŊæ¸æĨ äŊč¨åžærules芹 Easy/NormalåĨéĸæåĨŊäšoverlapéŊååĨŊåēįž
14:07 nold_1702: äŊäŋéģfixåĨŊQAQ
14:07 Pokie: æčŋčŊå°å°?
14:08 Pokie: äŊåžéĸpatternå°ąčĻčˇäŊæšåäē- -
14:08 Pokie: æ¯äŊåĻ/_\ wcxéŊ芹ååžåįŽ
14:08 nold_1702: čŊčŦwcxåĨŊå´,ædæˇ
14:09 Pokie: 02:46:731 (1) - ä¸éĸæåæéˇæĸslideræšåŽäšåžč¨åžfixčŋåĸå°åspacing
14:09 Pokie: äŋ
14:09 Pokie: æäģĨįäŊĸéģ
14:09 Pokie: 02:59:972 (1) - http://osu-ppy-sh.tvgratuite.org/ss/488979 å
14:10 Pokie: then čŦčŦfileåmod Hard-o- StoryboardåĨéĸåend02-e åĒåˇĻäŊĸ
14:10 Pokie: įļåžįĄäē
14:14 nold_1702: ok..fixå
14:15 Pokie: 00:59:145 (1,2,3,4) - Hardåĸå°ä¸éå§æå°å°éŖæäŊ århythm, maybeæčŊåžå¤Ēå¤æŦĄäŊ åI
14:15 Pokie: *Ex-.-
14:16 Pokie: æčĻēåžåĒ3, å°2æéˇæåĨŊå°å°âĻįäŊ æŗåæŗæš
14:16 nold_1702: fixed
14:18 Pokie: 01:28:938 (1) - å¯äģĨæéå¤å°å°
14:18 Pokie: 01:33:076 (3) - too
14:19 Pokie: 01:47:145 (1) - å äŊåįĨį¨åį¨åž
14:19 nold_1702: ææŗokayįå§lol
14:19 Pokie: ååå
14:21 nold_1702: waæå˛Šå˛ŠįäŊ profile
14:21 Pokie: -o-?
14:21 nold_1702: įŧįžäŊ åžæd maps evenäŊ ååžåšžåĨŊéŊææ¯åæd maps å°favs= =
14:22 Pokie: yea
14:22 Pokie: ArrowæåŧĩæäģĨįēæå¤äēēéæ äŊrateæŦčēĢéŊåįŽéĢ įåfavå°ąåäē
14:22 nold_1702: /_\
14:23 Pokie: eå§åæčŦ芹æranked mapsetå夠å¤
14:23 Pokie: éįļåĸåéŊäŋä¸ååå 
14:23 nold_1702: --
14:23 nold_1702: įĸé?
14:23 Pokie: äŊä¸ģčĻåéĄäŋæįĄä¸åŧĩåēč˛ čæäģŖ襨æ§æĸåæ...
14:23 Pokie: å§äŋåĨŊå¤äēēæįŠæį¨Ž
14:23 Pokie: åĨŊæŠæRin Dåæĸpcåˇ˛įļčļéæå°æDåĨŊå¤
14:24 nold_1702: ...ååŧĩæįšč˛d ålor...č2åææĸ,čˇäŊįåēåģ
14:24 Pokie: äŊįēåäŊĸä¸æéå§ååæĸ æå°å°åæ butįĸēå¯ĻæååįĄäščĒåˇąidea-.- åĸDé芹åéģ
14:24 Pokie: -.-|||
14:24 nold_1702: -.-
14:24 Pokie: æå˛åˇĻåŠåæååˇĻåŧĩäŊ čŠąäŧŧnattekeæĸ...
14:24 Pokie: =3=||||
14:25 nold_1702: äŊ čŊdiffååĢåx yædåĢäēēäŧ°éåå
14:25 nold_1702: æäŋ 70%äēēæį­äŊ natteke
14:25 Pokie: į§æ: æžæ­ģįå§, æčĸĢåį¨Žå¤§įēnukeį (éæŧæåslider)
14:25 Pokie: -.-
14:25 nold_1702: į§æåŠäž?..
14:25 Pokie: colin hou
14:25 nold_1702: ..
14:25 nold_1702: åéŊnukeåž/_\?
14:26 nold_1702: ....æ¯äŊ..åslideréŊäŋé¨äžŋåą..čŊå°ąå..
14:26 Pokie: =3= okok
14:26 Pokie: äšårinéŊå įēåslideræ¯äēēunrank+čĒnuke, įĄåŠååžæĸå
14:27 nold_1702: fixed
14:27 Pokie: =3= åĨŊįšŧįēį
14:28 Pokie: 02:07:007 - æéæäŊ åĸpart éįļideaåĨŊį°ĄåŽbutåĨŊæfeel ^_^
14:28 nold_1702: lol
14:28 Pokie: 02:38:455 (1) - ä¸æ¨Ŗåéå°å°
14:29 nold_1702: fixed
14:30 Pokie: 02:59:145 (1,2) - åĸå°čˇåčˇčŋäŊ Exæå°æĸhitsound? åĒæįŦŦä¸åslideré ­å finish
14:30 nold_1702: ok
14:30 nold_1702: ah
14:30 nold_1702: éŊäŋååĨŊ
14:31 nold_1702: åčˇ
14:31 Pokie: -.- sbäģŖįĸŧæå°å°éæš į­æéŖ
14:31 nold_1702: ..
14:31 nold_1702: æåŠlol
14:31 Pokie: endæå°åfade outæĒæ´åĨŊ
14:32 nold_1702: lol..įæåå°haha
14:32 Pokie: hahahaåådifféŊäŋ åĨŊäŧŧ
14:32 nold_1702: -åŖ-
14:32 nold_1702: http://osu-ppy-sh.tvgratuite.org/u/469244
14:34 nold_1702: čŊåŽäšåžįåå¤æ芹logåģthread lol
14:36 Pokie: http://puu.sh/1otGR
14:37 Pokie: =3=
14:37 nold_1702: čžčĻäē

1. Inconsistency in combo colours
2. A storyboard was detected, you may want to include an epilepsy warning.

1. 00:59:145 (5) - pretty embarrassing for beginners, i'd just use 1/1 slider here
2. 01:38:869 (3) - 4 hit slider is a bit hard to read imo, consider removing 1 arrow plz
3. 02:25:627 (1) - remove NC, or NC at 02:22:317 (5) -

1. 00:24:248 (1,2) - switch NC to keep your combo pattern
2. 00:32:524 (3) - confusing, stack on the slider plz
3. 00:39:145 (3,4) - same as 00:24:248 (1,2) -
4. 00:48:800 (2) - stack perfectly
5. 01:21:903 (2,3,4) - confusing.. try other way
6. 01:26:041 - adding break here would make sense imo
7. 02:05:765 (2) - stack on 1 plz
8. 02:21:765 (1) - ^
9. 02:49:076 (5) - ^

1. 00:25:627 (4) - stack on 00:24:386 (1) - ?
2. 01:42:869 (4) - 1grid up the 2nd tick?
3. 01:43:835 (1,2,3) - idk if anti-jump is ok for a Hard diff :p
4. 02:59:972 (1) - 1grid left to place it on the same ordinate with 02:59:145 (1) - ?

1. 01:14:455 (2) - 1grid left, make better blanket
2. 02:39:696 (6) - 2 circles would be better for the beat imo

1. 00:59:145 (1,2,3) - was a bit hard to read, make it soft jump?
2. 01:14:869 (1,2) - annoying
3. 01:16:524 (1,2) - ^
4. 01:18:179 (1,2) - ^
5. 01:23:145 (5) - with low volume is ok imo
6. 01:35:145 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - a bit hard now imo, like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:21:076 (3,4) - same as what i mentioned
8. 02:22:731 (1,2) - ^
9. 02:24:386 (1,2) - ^
10. 02:29:352 (5) - ^ at least why no low volume for it?
11. 02:35:558 (6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - like this?

SPOILER

Star Stream wrote: 2c4j26

From my queue

[General]

1. Inconsistency in combo colours it's intention you know.
2. A storyboard was detected, you may want to include an epilepsy warning.

SB already includes it so it's not necessary to add one more epilepsy warning.

[FL]

1. 00:59:145 (5) - pretty embarrassing for beginners, i'd just use 1/1 slider here it really fits.
2. 01:38:869 (3) - 4 hit slider is a bit hard to read imo, consider removing 1 arrow plz Umm..?The slider is slow enough to read IMO.
3. 02:25:627 (1) - remove NC, or NC at 02:22:317 (5) -

??Why...

[RG]

1. 00:24:248 (1,2) - switch NC to keep your combo pattern What do you mean,it already keeps.
2. 00:32:524 (3) - confusing, stack on the slider plz I don't get why.
3. 00:39:145 (3,4) - same as 00:24:248 (1,2) - okay.
4. 00:48:800 (2) - stack perfectly Are you praising regou's stacking skills?Thanks.
5. 01:21:903 (2,3,4) - confusing.. try other way I think that's okay.
6. 01:26:041 - adding break here would make sense imo But I think it doesn't make any sense in this way o.0 Apology for that.
7. 02:05:765 (2) - stack on 1 plz No
8. 02:21:765 (1) - ^ ^
9. 02:49:076 (5) - ^

^

[HNold]

1. 00:25:627 (4) - stack on 00:24:386 (1) - ? no it's intention and I think it's more aesthetic than stacking under. It effects the same place with stacking under (1)
2. 01:42:869 (4) - 1grid up the 2nd tick? Why :/?
3. 01:43:835 (1,2,3) - idk if anti-jump is ok for a Hard diff :p Why not ?
4. 02:59:972 (1) - 1grid left to place it on the same ordinate with 02:59:145 (1) - ?

no,I don't like linear mapping.

[INold]

1. 01:14:455 (2) - 1grid left, make better blanket okay
2. 02:39:696 (6) - 2 circles would be better for the beat imo

No,one slider=2 circles lol.

[ND1]

1. 00:59:145 (1,2,3) - was a bit hard to read, make it soft jump? no since it doesn't fit in soft jump.
2. 01:14:869 (1,2) - annoying no for all.It fits the best way even it's a bit annoying.
3. 01:16:524 (1,2) - ^
4. 01:18:179 (1,2) - ^
5. 01:23:145 (5) - with low volume is ok imo Hmm?...I think it's okay...
6. 01:35:145 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - a bit hard now imo, like this? :/ It's aesthetic and fits the song so I don't want to change it just because it's hard lol.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:21:076 (3,4) - same as what i mentioned As above
8. 02:22:731 (1,2) - ^
9. 02:24:386 (1,2) - ^
10. 02:29:352 (5) - ^ at least why no low volume for it? As above
11. 02:35:558 (6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - like this?

It's a bit hard to hit.My pattern is better I guess.

SPOILER

Good luck then

wcx19911123 wrote: 2h2g3d

[RG]
00:48:800 (2) - this note can stack better
01:11:145 (3) - try this? http://puu.sh/1oz9q to fit the different hitsounds in same rhyme here
02:17:352 (3) - ^, change the end's shape a bit here to follow the hitsound change is nice
02:49:076 (5) - hope you can overlap the slider a bit more(not completely stack), or it's kinda hard to read the rhyme here from the approach circles

All fixed!

really nice
call me back then
PS. about the slider shape change at 01:11:145 (3) - , if you want to change, better to change all the same rhyme at all diffs to make it as a holistic mapset

wcx19911123 wrote: 2h2g3d

as your request here

[General]
RG's kiai is different from other diffs oppp,,yes my wrong.

[sb]
warning.png disappeared too early, make it fade out at about 00:11:145 - is better asking pokie ><

[RG]
regou is replying it.
[HNold]
01:11:145 (3) - same as RG here done~
02:17:766 (3) - move the note up? like 48:56, you already know the reason 68,56 LOL

[INold]
00:24:248 - why not add a note here? there're notes at same rhyme in this diff done
00:52:524 (5) - need to add newcombo here, to make the anti-jump easier to read done

[ND1]
02:34:869 (3,5) - this can blanket better oppp,okay -v-

really nice
call me back then
PS. about the slider shape change at 01:11:145 (3) - , if you want to change, better to change all the same rhyme at all diffs to make it as a holistic mapset

1. BPM is doubled; should be 72.5 (In fact, the only place in the song that's actually at 145bpm is 02:33:489 - section; that section you can keep 145bpm, but the rest is 72.5).
2. As such, SB flashing light pattern at 100524 and 166731 is too fast. Halve the effect.

1. Consider OD8.
2. 00:47:282 (5) - Too long, should end at 00:47:420 - .
3. 00:52:524 (1) - Same with this and 00:53:351 (1) - this, and 01:34:731 (1) - and 02:04:524 (1) - . If you insist on keeping these, an alternative would be to silence slider end since you're following a tone with an ambiguous ending.
4. 01:56:662 (1,2) - There's not enough time given to prepare for this sv increase. Additionally, decrease the spacing to 1.00x or 1.20x, your choice here.
5. 02:03:696 (1) - Remove new combo.
6. 02:59:145 (1,1,1,1) - Current sv pattern does not make sense; should be decreasing instead of increasing like what you did in INold.

1. OD7. Standard Insane diff OD.
2. 01:00:386 (5) - Current ending is awkward without an object at 01:00:662 - . Try repeat slider.

1. 02:49:076 (5,6) - Surely you can make this look better.

1. All your long sliders appear to have been made with little effort, while they all can use simple fixes. For example, 02:54:179 (2) - ; moving the anchors directly on top of the slider ticks will make it that much more accurate. Go through your map to see what else you can do to fix your long sliders.

alacat wrote: 1qva

sry ,nold

go go rank ! (ﾉ*･ω･)ﾉ

those wrote: 2f131h

[General]

1. BPM is doubled; should be 72.5 (In fact, the only place in the song that's actually at 145bpm is 02:33:489 - section; that section you can keep 145bpm, but the rest is 72.5). ... also,see garven,wcx's thought
2. As such, SB flashing light pattern at 100524 and 166731 is too fast. Halve the effect. fixed

[ND1]

1. Consider OD8. I did put it in my cosideration but I just find it's too hard for this diff.Sorry for that.
2. 00:47:282 (5) - Too long, should end at 00:47:420 - . I leave it a long slider because it plays better for me.There's no any sound on either 00:47:420 nor 00:47:489 so I think the slider is fine to be end on both of the timing.Hope you understand
3. 00:52:524 (1) - Same with this and 00:53:351 (1) - this, and 01:34:731 (1) - and 02:04:524 (1) - . If you insist on keeping these, an alternative would be to silence slider end since you're following a tone with an ambiguous ending. okay I slience them by soft hitsound : ).
4. 01:56:662 (1,2) - There's not enough time given to prepare for this sv increase. Additionally, decrease the spacing to 1.00x or 1.20x, your choice here. There's no a giant difference between 1.0 slider speed and 1.2 slider speed.And I caught SnowWhite , myself and many more players to test played it and they thought it was fine.Also they didn't miss here.So hope you understand us.
5. 02:03:696 (1) - Remove new combo. Apology for resisting your suggestion.Since 02:03:282 (1) isn't a group of 02:03:696 (1) (2) (3) I am not willing to put them together in a single group of new combo.(They really sound different).Hope you can understand me.Apology for that.
6. 02:59:145 (1,1,1,1) - Current sv pattern does not make sense; should be decreasing instead of increasing like what you did in INold. Okay~.

[INold]

1. OD7. Standard Insane diff OD. The reason I don't want to change it,is the map is AR8.And AR8 with OD7 is a kind of nightmare for players.For me,I'm a standard insane player,I'm able to FC it this diff with ten 100s on second try.So I think the OD is enoguh for a insane(Especially this diff isn't that hard.)Apology for not applying this suggestion
2. 01:00:386 (5) - Current ending is awkward without an object at 01:00:662 - . Try repeat slider. Hmm yes.~

[RG]

1. 02:49:076 (5,6) - Surely you can make this look better. Done

[FL]

1. All your long sliders appear to have been made with little effort, while they all can use simple fixes. For example, 02:54:179 (2) - ; moving the anchors directly on top of the slider ticks will make it that much more accurate. Go through your map to see what else you can do to fix your long sliders. Fixed two of them.Since I think fixing other sliders' shape doesn't fit.Hope you understand me><

1214,827.586206896552,4,2,0,100,1,0
21076,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
21489,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
21627,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
22317,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
22455,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
23145,-100,4,2,2,60,0,0
23282,-100,4,2,1,60,0,0
...(cont)

97214,-66.666666666666,4,1,1,70,0,0

97214,-33.333333333333,4,1,1,70,0,0

Flask wrote: 5l1l4k

call 911 NOW !!!!!!!

wcx19911123 wrote: 2h2g3d

can anyone prove BPM 72.5 is the right one but not 145? I don't think this song is such a slow song, mostly ppl will feel odd when they see this one is a 72.5-BPM song imo

Garven wrote: 3w455y

Keep the BPM as the same thing for the entire song. It can be 145 or the 72.5. Don't change it in the middle when there is no tempo change. If you're running 72.5, tick rate 2. 145 should be rate 1.

1. Remove Pokie from tag and I can rank.

LKs wrote: 6u1w52

nevertheless this isn't a music theory test software but a music game. lower bpm also influences(adverse) the special modes
we're just aiming for the best playing experience and what the ordinary ppl feel the best(most possible seem to be) with
anyway happy to see this bubbled. altough it has totally changed it's original look compared to the first ver

kanpakyin wrote: 366t19

yes.

[General]

1. Remove Pokie from tag and I can rank.

Fionana wrote: 48192p

gratz!

deadbeat wrote: 3l3a6y

ND1 diff makes me cry ;____;

Flask wrote: 5l1l4k

CALL 911NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Winshley wrote: 6d5j56

Not much of an issue for me, but since the epilepsy warning is SB-based (not from the beatmap settings), you can't disable Storyboard from Fun Spoiler options unless you had to the map first.

If you actually enabled the SB warning from the beatmap settings, you can disable it even without playing it beforehand. '~'

Fionana wrote: 48192p

gratz!

Winshley wrote: 6d5j56

Bah humbug, I typo'd... *edits* <.<;;;

wcx19911123 wrote: 2h2g3d

迟来的恭喜
顺道，卧槽泥马ND1的HD啥时候弄成7的，会死人的喂
谁干的。。

1. The [ND1] has too much SV changes which make it unreadable, this is not sightreadable at first attempt. People are not supposed to know the song/map when they play it. The SV changes are fine, they fit the song, the problem is that it is almost impossible to guess when they will happen (you did something with combo colours, this is nice but not enough since they haven't a consistent meaning, and the player is not supposed to guess that they show a SV change).
   Therefore you have to use slidertick rate 3 (better than STR 1 actually ...), it fits the song and will show when the SV changes accurately so that the player doesn't have to wonder when it will happen.
2. The background file size is too big (1,58 Mo). This is too much ... Encode it in .jpg please.
3. You made a typo in the storyboard. It is spelled "epilepsy".
   
   SPOILER

   

Kurai wrote: 4o3o

[list][*]The [ND1] has too much SV changes which make it unreadable, this is not sightreadable at first attempt.

Aqo wrote: 2c2q2z

Here is how you read SV changes: you look at the sliderticks

those wrote: 2f131h

Aqo wrote: 2c2q2z

Here is how you read SV changes: you look at the sliderticks

But it's hard to do that when they aren't there

Aqo wrote: 2c2q2z

It can be cleared thus it definitely should be ranked

Aqo wrote: 2c2q2z

I just don't like the idea of maps being unranked because of SV changes since most people have trouble with them D: if anything, more maps need to do them so that people get used to read them correctly instead of guessing slider speeds or forcing mappers to rely on combo colors

Aqo wrote: 2c2q2z

WRONG

[...]

Blue Dragon wrote: 42171m

Why the hell isn't this approved instead of ranked then? Isn't that the damn meaning of it? @_@

Blue Dragon wrote: 42171m

Why the hell isn't this approved instead of ranked then? Isn't that the damn meaning of it? @_@

Kurai wrote: 4o3o

Ok, now tell me how people are supposed to know 01:28:938 (5) and 01:29:765 (1) don't have the same SV although they are both 2/3 long.

Kyou-kun wrote: 1b5j4h

Both me and Tom were able to easily full combo this in our first tries. Don't see how you could think those sliders can't be sightread. Oh, right; most of osu!'s community sucks at the game

Mr Color wrote: 2r8t

Dude stop people are gonna take you seriously

Kyou-kun wrote: 1b5j4h

Both me and Tom were able to easily full combo this in our first tries. Don't see how you could think those sliders can't be sightread. Oh, right; most of osu!'s community sucks at the game

Nilsso wrote: 1h2px

I approve of this, haha... To the s: Go play some AR10-AR11 if u cant "read" the sliders. Oh! And get a new skin, bet ur playing with big ass 300 signs so u cant see anything.

those wrote: 2f131h

Nilsso wrote: 1h2px

I approve of this, haha... To the s: Go play some AR10-AR11 if u cant "read" the sliders. Oh! And get a new skin, bet ur playing with big ass 300 signs so u cant see anything.

Well I hope you're glad the istrative team isn't based on ability to play. Also, having FC'd this (with default skin, just so you know) is not the reason why I bubbled this.