Maybe we should like, hold conversations or something here so it's not mostly just useless spam.
Erm..
So how's life?
Erm..
So how's life?
349 is not even edgy. Making quote towers to circumvent the point of making it 350 characters max is edgy.Flanster wrote: 1c1t1t
abraker wrote: 5u2f3m
what the fuck
I will have to enact a 350 character rule. If your post is more than 350 characters you will get penalized
Go for it even though they will post 349.
Posting mechanics. Sure you can wait a long while to post, but posting at a more regular interval would give you more points. There should be an optimal number of posts for a time interval vs waiting as long to make a single post, however I never bothered to calculate it. On the other hand, if you want to go for the highest single score then that's fine too.johnmedina999 wrote: 6n2y71
Nope!
Though I have to ask, @abraker, why not just make the score function bescore = seconds/60, because it's pretty close to that anyway. Why add the logarithms?
n = log(2000.0/60.0)/log(24)You can see the 2000 in there. 60 for seconds -> minute conversion, and 24 for hours in a day. Don't more than that at the current moment.
b = 60.0/pow(60.0, n)
score = b * pow(seconds_ed/60.0, n)
science: takes a gazillion dollars to do rigorous testing to suggest the possibility that a theoretical model might be correct.johnmedina999 wrote: 6n2y71
none of abeaker's bots ever work :p