ProEzreal wrote: 625n22
im in the list of rookies lol
it wasn't my intention to cover every single map's genre in the genre-specific category, but just the larger ones, to find out which is the best in its specific genre. of course, that means not all maps will be valid in the genre-specific voting.fartownik wrote: 3l1h
how do i nominate Meikaruza when it's not a Rhythm Game, Electronic (Dubstep, Neurofunk, Hardcore, DnB, etc.), Touhou, Western or Japanese
why not create an "Other" or "Novelty" category thenhandsome wrote: 483w1s
it wasn't my intention to cover every single map's genre in the genre-specific category, but just the larger ones, to find out which is the best in its specific genre. of course, that means not all maps will be valid in the genre-specific voting.
although yes a general section exists, an 'Other' or 'Novelty' category is just way too big in my opinion. it's not even a specific genre and it's weird to award something for being the best of 'everything that wasn't included'. like i said, to me the focus wasn't to include every map, but rather the focus was on the best maps for the bigger, defined genres.Frostings wrote: 4k1l2i
why not create an "Other" or "Novelty" category thenhandsome wrote: 483w1s
it wasn't my intention to cover every single map's genre in the genre-specific category, but just the larger ones, to find out which is the best in its specific genre. of course, that means not all maps will be valid in the genre-specific voting.
Bonsai wrote: 5l2nj
I'm a nominator
also, at what time on the 16th / what timezone does it end exactly? bc I found this just now, and am not home until 16th so get stressed out xdd
[b]Proof of Eligibility:[/b]
[heading]MAPS[/heading]
[b]Grand MCA Award[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Hitsounds[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Storyboard[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Marathon[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Rhythm Game[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Electronic[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Touhou[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Western[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Japanese[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[heading]S[/heading]
[b]Grand MCA Award[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Mapper[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Modder[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Storyboarder[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Rookie[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
[b]Outstanding Contribution[/b]
[list][*] ( )[/list]
I'm lazy, thank you for thisErunamoJAZZ wrote: 63iv
Literally, I have only 3 pages of 2016 played maps... :/ (and total is 51)
https://osu-ppy-sh.tvgratuite.org/p/beatmaplist?m=-1&r=7&g=0&la=0&ra=
btw, complete temple if someone (lazy people) wants:
many things
not enough 2hey maps LULEvilElvis wrote: ke6g
Sanae-san not a tuuhea song tbh
removed lolExile- wrote: 6r681a
How is 6th a storyboarder?
Probably an error because of that https://osu-ppy-sh.tvgratuite.org/s/423481removed lolExile- wrote: 6r681a
How is 6th a storyboarder?
there wasn't writeups for every category, and outstanding contribution would basically be anyone who has contributed to the mapping scene in 2016 outstandingly, very big surprise! there are some stretches in nominees but i left them there cuz there wasn't a very strict guideline, and most 'joke' nominees won't be voted in either way.Monstrata wrote: 5o4w3u
What was the criteria again for outstanding contribution? (Didn't there used to be a write up on each category).
I don't understand how it's complicated.Flower wrote: 7041n
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
it's more of a 'unnecessarily complicated' than anything. formatting and all, i can understand where he's coming from. we just lack a proper system to vote for stuff with verification (which is why we didn't use Google Forms), so this'll have to do.Shiirn wrote: 4dp13
I don't understand how it's complicated.
You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/s you want to give X amount of points.
I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.
i don't see how that's a reason to remove it. this vote is purely subjective and opinion based, if a feels that X didn't contribute, he wouldn't vote. yeah sure there's the fact that not everyone who contributes aims to get their name out there for exposure, so the average person won't 'notice' them. but i think it's a fair compromise so that the people who contribute get at least some sort of recognition, rather than none at all in the name of 'fairness'.MrSergio wrote: 4q6o5v
Then please remove the oustanding contribution bracket lmao.
As I said there is no meaning in blindly voting on assumptions. Differently from the other brackets, this one can't really be based on "subjective stuff": I can say that X's mods are better than Y's imo, but if someone contributes to the game is a solid fact. By itself it shouldn't even really exist a voting, since it's something you can decide based on objective stuff.
StarrStyx wrote: 55366
tbh you could have set up google forms but require the to pm for verification (within a set amount of time or w/e, that is) that it is actually them that casted the vote.
You are changing the topic. What I meant is that I spent almost a whole afternoon composing a single PM with given format, not counting time spent checking beatmaps and people. This simply sucks.Shiirn wrote: 4dp13
I don't understand how it's complicated.Flower wrote: 7041n
The system through PM is so complicated that I doubt whether there will be more than a dozen of people vote for something different from their nomination.
You have 13 votes split among 7 points. you list what maps/s you want to give X amount of points.
I'd be shocked if someone actually used all 13 votes for each section, there isn't enough content for that.