{"content":"\n \n \n Kuifich\n <\/span>\n \n \n \n \n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Kuifich<\/span>\n\n \n 2012-04-18T14:59:59+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n lol ~ I love this song~~~wwwwwwwww so much!<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n DarknessAngel<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,237 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n DarknessAngel<\/a>\n\n \n 2012-04-18T15:02:32+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n KayeSara wrote:<\/h4>>KS's hardFix something.Thanks for all your modding :3\u8ba9mod\u6765\u7684\u66f4\u6fc0\u70c8\u5427<\/blockquote>\u54c8\uff01\u54c8\uff01\u54c8\uff01\u54c8\uff01\u54c8\uff01\u54c8\uff01\u54c8\uff01\u5728\u4f60\u8aaa\u9019\u8a71\u4e4b\u524d\u6211\u53ef\u662f\u505a\u4e86\u8207\u4f60\u671f\u5f85\u76f8\u7b26\u7684\u4e8b\u554a\u7b49\u5f85\u4e4b\u5f8c\u7684\u767c\u5c55\uff0c\u5230\u6642\u5019\u5225\u5acc\u592a\u591a\u554a\uff0c\u563f\u563f\u563fupdate ~<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n riffy<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 8,061 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed December 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n riffy<\/a>\n\n \n 2012-04-18T15:04:29+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n hi~thanks for asking me for mod :3General<\/span>AiBAt<\/a>Hard<\/div><\/div>Hardtry to keep numbers on circles under 10 ><<\/span>01:07:692 (7,9) - overlap01:07:435 (6) - new combo?D.N.Angel00:23:090 (3) - x192 y200 for better looking pattern 00:19:501 (7,8,9,1) - maybe stack (8) and (1) and don't forget to also move 7 and 900:21:295 (2,3) - looks a bit messy. >< try to make slider follow approach-circle's shape00:27:447 (3,4,5,6,7) - try to make star :300:28:729 (1,2) - this shape looks a bit messy for me :< try to make same shape as (3)00:52:312 (4) - yeah. it's nice slider but this ruins this slider. you can make another shape00:53:850 (2) - overjump?01:04:359 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - stack (3) and change shape http:\/\/puu.sh\/qejw<\/a>01:06:666 (3,2) - try to make a bit more neat shape01:08:717 (4,1,2) - symmetrical somehow?01:46:654 (1,2,3,4) - wtf shape? select one circle, hold shift and move it!01:48:705 (1) - aren't neat shape ><01:50:499 (4) - overjump. i can't see reasons to put here jump01:57:933 (4) - x440 y23601:58:702 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - put it in the center :<02:05:623 (5,6,7) - symmetrical? if yes - fix. if not - make symmetrical \\:D\/02:08:699 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - put this pattern in the center of playfield?02:28:693 (3) - i believe that this slider can inherit (4)'s approach-circle shape also: stack (3)'s end with (1)'s start!02:31:256 (1,2,3,4,5) - should be in the center of playfieldYou can place a lot of patterns right in the centre of playfield without any damage for your map!<\/span><\/strong>03:35:340 (2,4) - fix their shapes!Boss's taikomapping taiko like a boss! \\:D\/ really amazing mapped! >.< i don't know a lot about taiko but sounds amazing!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Nothing really wrong. Sorry can't mod all difs ;_;anyway, Star!<\/strong><\/span><\/span>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~My mod: some nazi-slider-mods and some nazi-mod. hitsounds and other things looks good. gl~<\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n DarknessAngel<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,237 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n DarknessAngel<\/a>\n\n \n 2012-04-18T15:10:29+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Kuifich wrote:<\/h4>lol ~ I love this song~~~wwwwwwwww so much!<\/blockquote>yeah,me ~~~wwwwwwwww,too !<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Niva<\/a>\n\n \n Global \n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,190 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2009<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Niva<\/a>\n\n \n 2012-04-19T10:21:14+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Hi DarknessAngel~Uh, I'll just mod the two hardest diffs... The song is long already, and I don't really like moe songs to be honest ><[General]<\/span><\/strong><\/span>-> Storyboard should not content unnecessary transparency<\/u> - your lyric SB is still containing it ):-> Remove the line F,0,16423,240712,1 from Sprite,Background,Centre,\"a1f39b3294104b949c594a2fe644fc8a.jpg\",320,240 as you don't need this code to show the main background again, plus it only gives extra storyboard load<\/u>-> Also about storyboard, the SB Load goes over 5.00x on 03:00:478<\/u>, either remove the line above or you can reduce the scaling on White Effect.png's S,0,196858,197371,0.4959999,1.952<\/u>[KS's Hard]<\/span><\/strong><\/span>-> Hmm, I prefer to use [KS' Hard]<\/strong> to avoid mods complaining about the grammatical error but it's up to you00:16:425 (1) - Add whistle on slider's start as well? I know you already have a finish there, but if you listen to the song carefully you'll notice this part's high-pitched synth fits for a whistle :3<\/li>00:29:498 (2,3,4,5,6) - Why this star pattern looks uneven? Try this code (I can't assure perfection but this one looks tidier than your current one) :428,224,29498,1,2348,256,29754,1,2340,120,30011,1,0420,141,30267,1,8298,193,30523,1,2<\/pre><\/li>00:30:780 (1,2,3) - Hmm, to be honest your whistling around here is very random... And what bugs me very much is the whistle on (1)'s start - you don't need whistle this intense<\/u> (as you already have a whistle on your previous (6)). Try to reduce the amount of whistle around here? (try to put only on (1)'s repeat, (2)'s start and repeat, and (3)'s start and repeat)<\/li>00:32:574 (5) - Contrary to the post above, you need a whistle here to continue your rhythm<\/u> - feels kinda weird having the whistle stopped here xD<\/li>00:33:856 (3) - (optional)<\/em> I don't think this slider plays really good (because it shares the same direction with 00:34:881 (7), so the jump from (6) to (7) will feel repetitive)... Perhaps try to face the slider to a different direction, or try to create a pentagon like this (so the jump will play more natural imo) :<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>00:39:239 (2,3,4,5) - This pattern looks random imo, although it's readable. Perhaps move (3) and (5) lower so (2,3) and (4,5) will create a fan pattern?<\/li>00:44:109 (7) - (optional)<\/em> CTRL+R this to continue the jump? (I highly suggest this with the pattern below)<\/li>00:44:622 (8,9) - Unstack these two<\/u> - this stack really kills flow, and what's more it will ruin the spacing consistency in play mode<\/u>. Assuming you're following the mod above, you can make a triangle jump like this here (plays great!)<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>00:48:467 (6,7,8) - (optional)<\/em> Put (6) above (2), (7) on where (6) was, and (8) on where (7) was? (7,8,1)'s triangle would be much more guessable\/readable this way imo<\/li>01:04:616 (7) - Err, do you really need to continue your normal sampleset here? Too strong for this part imo (try soft-hitwhistle instead)<\/li>01:14:869 (3,4,6) - Don't stop the whistle here yet<\/u> - the song haven't changed here, I think it's best to keep up with your whistles here<\/li>01:20:252 (9,10,11) - Move it few grids right so (7,8,9)'s spacing is equal - I know you're aiming to make (7,9,12)'s spacing equal, but - stacking's nature will make it unequal in play mode<\/u>. To get it look equal in play mode, you have to arrange it this way<\/li>01:32:300 (7) - A clap should be on slider's end here, instead of whistle<\/li>01:48:192 (3) - (optional)<\/em> Put it in the center of (2),(4),and (5) to tidy up this part? <\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:50:756 (1,2,3,4,5,6,...) - Rather than all whistles, I think you could give more variation with the hitsounds here<\/u>, as following:01:50:756 (1) - Whistle on start, no hitsound on end<\/li>01:51:268 (2) - Clap on start, whistle on end<\/li>01:51:781 (3) - No hitsound<\/li>01:52:037 (4) - Whistle on start, clap on end<\/li>01:52:550 (5) - Whistle<\/li>01:52:806 (6) - Whistle on both start and end<\/li>01:53:319 (7) - Clap on start, whistle on end - remove the sliderwhistle<\/u><\/li>01:53:832 (8) - No change with your current hitsound<\/li>01:54:601 (9) - Remove clap, as you don't need it so soon after your last one<\/li><\/ol>This way, it can live up this part's hitsounding by giving a more \"drum'n'bass-ish\" hitsound<\/li>02:10:493 (8,9,10) - Err, why don't you just make these three's distance equal by moving (9)? (they're equally apart in the timeline but not equally apart distance-wise, this could be confusing)<\/li>02:30:487 (9) - As you already have a whistle on your previous (3), how about adding one here as well to make it sound consistent? :3<\/li>02:35:870 (1) - (optional)<\/em> Hmm, I personally dislike how this slider almost touches your previous slider, perhaps use a tilted slider wave here? The pattern around here won't change that much imo:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>02:47:405 (11,12) - Err... Should (11) got overlapped by (9)? Moving these two few grids right to avoid such overlap isn't that hard, though...<\/li>02:52:276 (1) - Remove the sliderwhistle from this slider's body<\/u>, I don't think they fits here<\/li>02:53:045 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...uh, this part looks very<\/u> random, perhaps try the arrangement above? It doesn't change the pattern here - it only makes (2,3,4) equally orbiting (5) and (5,6,7) equally orbiting (2):<\/u><\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>03:12:526 (8) - As you already have two whistles on your previous (5,6), I don't see why you should stop the whistle here ><<\/li>03:19:447 (6,7,8,9,10) - (optional)<\/em> Make these five's jump spacing more consistent like below? Will play more naturally imo: <\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>03:32:776 (7) - Delete this note and use normal-sampleset on (8)? I love how the rhythm stops there - if you do this, you might want to stack (8) with (7) as well<\/li>03:40:210 (8,10,11) - (optional)<\/em> I think you can add more power with hitsounds here on this part, by adding whistle to each circles (this fits well especially considering the hitsounds you use on your next (1))<\/li>03:45:593 (1) - Hmm, I think you're too forcing to stack the slider's end to (8) instead, resulting in a weird overlap with (11). I think it's better to curve this encircling (11) so the slider's end could be stacked to (6), this way overlap won't happen<\/li>03:49:694 (9) - This jump is quite random for the ending imo. If you want to keep up with the randomness, I think it will be better to put this in the center, OR<\/u> if you want to keep it patterned, you can move (6,7,8) upward so (7,8,9) can form a triangle surrounding (6) <\/li><\/ol>[D.N.Angel]<\/span><\/strong><\/span>-> Err... Why the difficulty settings are exactly same<\/u> with Hard? At least, increase Overall Difficulty by 1 so it will look harder :300:20:526 (1) - (optional)<\/em> Sudden straight slider here doesn't play really good after your previous curves imo. Perhaps use a slider wave instead? This way, you can let the slider wave's second half to encircle (2) as well~<\/u><\/li>00:22:064 (4,1,2) - I don't really quite get the hitsounding here... I already experimented around here, and it sounds better if there's whistle on (4)'s end, and especially move the clap from (1) to (2)<\/u><\/li>00:26:166 (4,5,6) - Uhh I personally dislike this stack, in play mode (4) will almost touch (1) and there's nothing much to follow from the music on (5)<\/u>, perhaps remove (4,5) and add a repeat to your previous (3)?<\/li>00:31:036 (1) - The synth starts here. Add whistle on slider's start?<\/li>00:31:549 (2,3,4,5,1) - Uh, another random pattern you got here - perhaps try my suggestion below? This way, (2,3) and (4,5,1) will form a good symmetry<\/u>:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>00:34:625 (6,7,1) - Again, in this part stacking will ruin the spacing<\/u> - to avoid that, you can CTRL+R (1) here and stack (6,7) on (1)'s start<\/li>00:43:853 (3) - I like the doubles rhythm you previously did, why don't you continue it here by moving this 1\/4 earlier and adding whistle to this?<\/li>00:44:109 (5) - Move the whistle to slider's end<\/u>, especially if you did above suggestion<\/li>00:46:672 (5) - Leaving this unhitsounded before the crescendo could be disorienting<\/u>. A whistle on slider's end would help this already - but if you don't want to add a whistle, perhaps you can start the crescendo with a lower volume so it would blend better<\/li>01:09:742 (2) - Err... Is it intentional to curve the slider like this? It's better to curve it naturally encircling (1) imo xD<\/li>01:18:714 (1,2,3) - Normal sampleset sounds good here, but normal claps are just... orz >< - I suggest to use S:C2 only on the claps around here<\/u><\/li>01:21:021 (4,5) - (optional)<\/em> You can easily move them down to create a better pentagon pattern - don't worry, your AR here is fast enough, so it won't overlap with your next (1) in play mode<\/u> :3<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:28:711 (3) - Clap on slider's end is really<\/u> off, perhaps try to use whistle here instead and move the whistle on your next (4) to the slider's end?<\/li>01:31:787 (6,1) - This jump looks very<\/u> random, I suggest to move (6) upper and stack (1) to your next (3)'s end so the distance would be equal. Also, put the new combo on (2) instead (because it's the downbeat)<\/li>01:37:683 (1) - Again, I can't get the pattern here. Why don't you just encircle the previous five notes to this circle? Will play neater imo:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:56:908 (2) - Move to x:320 y:160 to let (2,3,4) forms a solid triangle - therefore, you can just rotate this slider<\/u> (no need to rework on it) to have this encircle (1) as before<\/li>02:09:212 (3) - Clap here sounds very<\/u> off. Place it on (5) instead, so the clap will be placed consistently 2\/1?<\/li>02:09:724 (5,6,7,8,9) - (optional)<\/em> This moving stream... It's usable, but I think it would be more fancy to arrange these five encircling your next (1) to build more flow~<\/li>02:33:051 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Hmm, I think you should make a small triangle jump first on (1,2,3) and then go wide on (4,5,6), this way it will give more dynamics to this part:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>02:40:484 (3) - Err... Are you trying to get (1,2,3,4)'s spacing consistent here? If so, then this should be moved few grids down...<\/li>02:57:402 (6) - Again, clap here sounds very off<\/u>. You already have a clap on (8) which is 2\/1 after (3), so you won't need another clap here<\/li> 5v4c5o