{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Pereira006<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,801 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Pereira006<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-01-18T20:09:33+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Rebubble #1<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Biggy<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 16 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Biggy<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-01-23T19:39:04+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Wow o k. I'm bad at modding and I could be making a complete ass of my self atm. Just let me know if this was actually right. 01:18:796 (2) - Ok well, Uhh that might be the most awkward curved slider ever. Since you're already going with the strange slider curved pattern you might aswell make that one too. Mp3 is superrr quiet. Try and change up some of the streams in there. Otherwise good map.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n HappyRocket88<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 4,322 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n HappyRocket88<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-01-23T20:32:51+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/center>Recheck upon your request.<\/strong><\/center><\/div>[ General<\/span>]Storyboard<\/u><\/strong> 01:35:891 Not sure what you wanted to do with that \"l\" after which there. Is that a misspelling? Consider to fix it in case that \"l\" don't follow the lyrics.<\/li><\/li> 05:57:558 (1) At the end of this spinner the storyboard should be faded out since this is the part where the song finished and in this way, you'll give players the idea the song has actually ended. <\/li><\/ol><\/div>[ Void Genome<\/span>] 00:47:475 (1,2,3,4) Would you mind using the same DS for this jump? I found it quite unpolished while I was testing it. Whlle making a proper square pattern would make things more fluent. Consider doing the same here 02:34:142 (1,2,3,4) <\/li> 01:01:475 (2) Please, try a smoother slider shape for this slider just as well as you did before. The current one has a weird transition after the red node making it flow way weird imo.<\/li> 01:04:142 (1,2,3,4,5,6) This jump play a little weird due the position of the objects from 01:04:975 (6,1) and 01:04:308 (2,3) . When making triangles like this one, try that the distance of 01:04:142 (1,2) be the same to 01:04:308 (2,3) In this way the cursor will go slightly better because the spacing is consistent. Consider applying the same here with these 01:04:641 (4,5) - 01:04:975 (6,1) <\/li> 01:06:642 (1) Remove NC and add NC here 01:06:808 (2) Consider doing the same in the following cases:<\/span><\/a> 01:18:475 (1) ^ 01:18:808 (2) - <\/li> 01:38:475 (1) - 01:38:808 (3) - <\/li> 01:39:808 (1) - 01:40:142 (2) -<\/li> 01:46:475 (1) - 01:46:808 (5) - <\/li> 01:51:475 (1) - 01:52:142 (3) - <\/li> 01:59:975 (1) - 02:00:142 (2) - <\/li> 02:34:142 (1) - 02:34:808 (5) - <\/li> 02:55:475 (1) - 02:56:142 (5) - <\/li> 03:16:308 (1) - 03:17:475 (5) - <\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/div><\/li> 01:08:142 (1) The length of this slider is rather extended and is skipping a very strong beat that you were following till now, which is 01:08:475 this one. I know you were following vocals but that beat needs to be highlighted just as well as you did in the previous patterns to keep consistency. Consider making that beat clickeable.<\/li> 01:12:141 (6,1) Swap NC.<\/li> 01:24:142 (5) NC here to keep consistency with the way you NC'ed the stream. <\/li> 01:38:808 (3,4,5) This pattern doesn't flow bad but I think the position of the sliders is rather random than making sense atm. I think if you would place them like this could make a better flow over this segment. <\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li> 01:39:808 (1,2) The distance between these is supposed to be higher than 01:40:308 (3,4) - where the current jump makes the patterning clutter in comparison of what you did here 01:37:475 (1,2,3) - . Make sure the distance between 1 -> 2 is higher than 3 -> 4. Placing 01:40:308 (3) - here x=208|y=192 would hurt no one.<\/li> 01:44:475 (2) Ctrl + G here to improve the flow of the previous slider-tail which suggested the next note will be at the top of itself. Consider doing the same here 01:45:142 (4)<\/li> 01:49:141 (9) Placing NC here would make an epic pattern just as well as the Dnb maps do with their short parts. Only a suggestion though.<\/li> 01:50:808 (1,2) The current rhythm of these notes isn't bad, however, it makes a weird pattern by placing the 1 stacking 3. The song suggest the new strong beat would be where 01:50:975 (2) is. Hence, Doing ctrl + G over those would make stuff easier to read. Then, consider placing 01:51:142 (3) here x=256|y=344 to avoid the direct stack.<\/li> 02:01:475 (6) NC here and remove NC here 02:02:142 (1) . Then consider adding NC here 02:02:808 (3) <\/li> 02:18:475 (1) Remove NC here.<\/li> 02:36:142 (9) NC here and remove NC here 02:36:808 (1) <\/li> 02:48:808 (1,2,3,4) When doing things like this, consider using the same velocity of the previous streams. The current 4 kick sliders are rather slow compared with the amount of taps players need to do in the past stream. Consider placing them like this to have the same velocity to give a better flow to this segment. <\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li> 03:01:308 (8) Oh, please. Don't under-tack it like this. It's the only one you managed on this part and plays rather weird. It would be better if you stack it in the next slider-head.<\/li> 03:11:475 (1) Remove NC here.<\/li> 03:13:725 I honestly found this space very weird considering on how you managed the next stream. I do believe placing a note here would make stuff more consistent and catchy.<\/li> 03:27:142 (1) Remove NC here.<\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n [ Another ]<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 171 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n [ Another ]<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-01-23T21:17:02+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n HappyRocket88 wrote:<\/h4>General<\/span>Storyboard<\/u><\/strong> 01:35:891 Not sure what you wanted to do with that \"l\" after which there. Is that a misspelling? Consider to fix it in case that \"l\" don't follow the lyrics. The translated lyrics says that, and it also makes sense.<\/span><\/li><\/li> 05:57:558 (1) At the end of this spinner the storyboard should be faded out since this is the part where the song finished and in this way, you'll give players the idea the song has actually ended. Sounds reasonable, done.<\/span><\/li><\/ol>[ Void Genome<\/span>] 00:47:475 (1,2,3,4) Would you mind using the same DS for this jump? I found it quite unpolished while I was testing it. Whlle making a proper square pattern would make things more fluent. Consider doing the same here 02:34:142 (1,2,3,4) That pattern feels pretty good for me in both mentioned sections, and the only way to use the same ds in that is making a boring. bad to play square pattern that would feel very strange compared to the whole map<\/span><\/li> 01:01:475 (2) Please, try a smoother slider shape for this slider just as well as you did before. The current one has a weird transition after the red node making it flow way weird imo. Done<\/span><\/li> 01:04:142 (1,2,3,4,5,6) This jump play a little weird due the position of the objects from 01:04:975 (6,1) and 01:04:308 (2,3) . When making triangles like this one, try that the distance of 01:04:142 (1,2) be the same to 01:04:308 (2,3) In this way the cursor will go slightly better because the spacing is consistent. Consider applying the same here with these 01:04:641 (4,5) - 01:04:975 (6,1) I dont agree with it but i polished up the DS in that section<\/span><\/li> 01:06:642 (1) Remove NC and add NC here 01:06:808 (2) Consider doing the same in the following cases: Done<\/span><\/span><\/a> 01:18:475 (1) ^ 01:18:808 (2) - <\/li> 01:38:475 (1) - 01:38:808 (3) - <\/li> 01:39:808 (1) - 01:40:142 (2) -<\/li> 01:46:475 (1) - 01:46:808 (5) - <\/li> 01:51:475 (1) - 01:52:142 (3) - <\/li> 01:59:975 (1) - 02:00:142 (2) - <\/li> 02:34:142 (1) - 02:34:808 (5) - <\/li> 02:55:475 (1) - 02:56:142 (5) - <\/li> 03:16:308 (1) - 03:17:475 (5) - <\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/div><\/li> 01:08:142 (1) The length of this slider is rather extended and is skipping a very strong beat that you were following till now, which is 01:08:475 this one. I know you were following vocals but that beat needs to be highlighted just as well as you did in the previous patterns to keep consistency. Consider making that beat clickeable. No, on that part i didnt follow many stronger beats because the following the vocal feels better to me<\/span><\/li> 01:12:141 (6,1) Swap NC. Done<\/span><\/li> 01:24:142 (5) NC here to keep consistency with the way you NC'ed the stream. Done<\/span><\/li> 01:38:808 (3,4,5) This pattern doesn't flow bad but I think the position of the sliders is rather random than making sense atm. I think if you would place them like this could make a better flow over this segment. Done<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li> 01:39:808 (1,2) The distance between these is supposed to be higher than 01:40:308 (3,4) - where the current jump makes the patterning clutter in comparison of what you did here 01:37:475 (1,2,3) - . Make sure the distance between 1 -> 2 is higher than 3 -> 4. Placing 01:40:308 (3) - here x=208|y=192 would hurt no one. Done<\/span><\/li> 01:44:475 (2) Ctrl + G here to improve the flow of the previous slider-tail which suggested the next note will be at the top of itself. Consider doing the same here 01:45:142 (4) Done<\/span><\/li> 01:49:141 (9) Placing NC here would make an epic pattern just as well as the Dnb maps do with their short parts. Only a suggestion though. Done<\/span><\/li> 01:50:808 (1,2) The current rhythm of these notes isn't bad, however, it makes a weird pattern by placing the 1 stacking 3. The song suggest the new strong beat would be where 01:50:975 (2) is. Hence, Doing ctrl + G over those would make stuff easier to read. Then, consider placing 01:51:142 (3) here x=256|y=344 to avoid the direct stack. Done<\/span><\/li> 02:01:475 (6) NC here and remove NC here 02:02:142 (1) . Then consider adding NC here 02:02:808 (3) Done<\/span><\/li> 02:18:475 (1) Remove NC here. Done<\/span><\/li> 02:36:142 (9) NC here and remove NC here 02:36:808 (1) Done<\/span><\/li> 02:48:808 (1,2,3,4) When doing things like this, consider using the same velocity of the previous streams. The current 4 kick sliders are rather slow compared with the amount of taps players need to do in the past stream. Consider placing them like this to have the same velocity to give a better flow to this segment. Changed up the pattern a little bit<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li> 03:01:308 (8) Oh, please. Don't under-tack it like this. It's the only one you managed on this part and plays rather weird. It would be better if you stack it in the next slider-head. Done<\/span><\/li> 03:11:475 (1) Remove NC here. Done<\/span><\/li> 03:13:725 I honestly found this space very weird considering on how you managed the next stream. I do believe placing a note here would make stuff more consistent and catchy. As i mentioned in a previous mod, i feel like this pattern is how i hear the song and i think that fits better than a longer stream<\/span><\/li> 03:27:142 (1) Remove NC here.Done<\/span><\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/blockquote>Thank you for the mod!Biggy wrote:<\/h4>01:18:796 (2) - Ok well, Uhh that might be the most awkward curved slider ever. Since you're already going with the strange slider curved pattern you might aswell make that one too. I dont really agree, that slider doesnt play badly, i will keep it.<\/span><\/blockquote>Thank you too!<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n HappyRocket88<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 4,322 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n HappyRocket88<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-01-23T21:27:45+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Let's give it a try. (\u30ce\uff65\u03c9\uff65)\u30ce x2<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Biggy<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 16 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Biggy<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-01-23T23:23:15+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Biggy wrote:<\/h4>01:18:796 (2) - Ok well, Uhh that might be the most awkward curved slider ever. Since you're already going with the strange slider curved pattern you might aswell make that one too. I dont really agree, that slider doesnt play badly, i will keep it.<\/span><\/blockquote>Thank you too![\/quote]alright, sorry for the trouble<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Frim4503<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,067 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n 9463y