{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Okoayu<\/a>\n\n \n Nomination Assessment Team\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 5,010 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Okoayu<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-06-25T14:26:12+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n 10nya wrote:<\/h4>might Okorin post some issues too? updated<\/blockquote>Yeah, I'll do that. Hopefully today<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,746 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-06-25T14:39:20+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n okay <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n wendao<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,638 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n wendao<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-06-26T03:45:32+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n 10nya wrote:<\/h4>wendao wrote:<\/h4>00:58:478 (4) - NC to make the combo only 3 notes is somehow bad for me, i'll keep mine<\/span> well make sense, just point it because of 00:56:573 (1,1) - <\/span>04:41:810 - honestly I don't think this Timing Point is necessary, because there's strong beat on 04:42:762 - this is somehow important, but it's fine to skip this one<\/span>04:58:636 - Timing Point because there's 1 ms difference, rly metronome changed, about timing i already asked some bns\/staff so there's should nothing wrong with it<\/span> are you sure there's change of metronome? for the timing itself, it's just weird (for me at least) that someone can hear 1 ms differences<\/span><\/blockquote><\/blockquote><\/span>metronome<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,746 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-07-16T17:24:38+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n ^ gonna talk with other timing expert about it, since I asked a lot already ww.+:\uff61(\uff89\uff65\u03c9\uff65)\uff89\uff9e<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n MisterDinner<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 107 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n MisterDinner<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-08-08T17:09:48+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n hey, thats pretty good.Im a noob but ill mod the best i can<\/span>mod<\/a>00:03:081 (3,3) - the way the ends of these dont point directly at the next note, bleh it stands out for me00:17:684 (2) - ^00:45:303 (4) - ^01:20:700 (1) - ^02:46:889 (1) - ^ also make the elbow appear earlier to make better use of momentum03:17:524 (3) - ^ *another elbow timing complaint*03:37:048 (4) - ^ you can keep the elbow just point the start at the next note, youll have to change the position of this 03:38:001 (1) - as well which will put it in the direct path of the previous note00:25:144 (2) - maybe this could be pointed directly away from the previous note for flow reasons01:25:144 (3) - ^ could be wrapped around the next slider03:15:620 (3) - ^ make it curve away from the previous slider itll flow better03:20:858 (3) - ^03:35:143 (5) - ^01:29:906 (2,3) - these stand out, it doesnt seem right to have the ends snapped to orchestral hits01:34:985 (2,3) - ^01:40:065 (2,3) - ^01:09:430 (1,2,3,4) - for me it doesnt look nice to have sliders touching eachother in that way, Kappa00:49:112 (1) - ^01:14:192 (3,4,1) - make this straight it looks ugly02:28:794 (3,4,5) - ^02:46:572 (1) - the second segment should be horizontal to the slider above it04:49:428 (1) - ^04:20:858 (5) - ew, make it bend around the previous note more05:34:985 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4) - make this perfectly round05:58:318 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - ^06:01:175 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ this should bend around the note before itThose 2 spinners at the end are un needed, the map already has almost 6 minutes of play time so you can use it as a result screen outro bit<\/div><\/div>Its a nice map, just a bunch of flow problems<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,746 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-08-09T02:36:29+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n MisterDinner wrote:<\/h4>hey, thats pretty good.Im a noob but ill mod the best i can<\/span>mod<\/a>00:03:081 (3,3) - the way the ends of these dont point directly at the next note, bleh it stands out for me00:17:684 (2) - ^00:45:303 (4) - ^ no problem here imo<\/span>01:20:700 (1) - ^02:46:889 (1) - ^ also make the elbow appear earlier to make better use of momentum03:17:524 (3) - ^ *another elbow timing complaint*03:37:048 (4) - ^ you can keep the elbow just point the start at the next note, youll have to change the position of this 03:38:001 (1) - as well which will put it in the direct path of the previous note00:25:144 (2) - maybe this could be pointed directly away from the previous note for flow reasons01:25:144 (3) - ^ could be wrapped around the next slider03:15:620 (3) - ^ make it curve away from the previous slider itll flow better03:20:858 (3) - ^03:35:143 (5) - ^01:29:906 (2,3) - these stand out, it doesnt seem right to have the ends snapped to orchestral hits it's full of 1\/1 notes so making slider would be better to follow<\/span>01:34:985 (2,3) - ^01:40:065 (2,3) - ^01:09:430 (1,2,3,4) - for me it doesnt look nice to have sliders touching eachother in that way, Kappa idk i like these xD<\/span>00:49:112 (1) - ^01:14:192 (3,4,1) - make this straight it looks ugly well i prefer my own atm ><<\/span>02:28:794 (3,4,5) - ^02:46:572 (1) - the second segment should be horizontal to the slider above it04:49:428 (1) - ^04:20:858 (5) - ew, make it bend around the previous note more05:34:985 (5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4) - make this perfectly round05:58:318 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - ^06:01:175 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^ this should bend around the note before itThose 2 spinners at the end are un needed, the map already has almost 6 minutes of play time so you can use it as a result screen outro bit to end the map at first spinner is somehow 'hanging' the song tbh<\/span><\/div><\/div>Its a nice map, just a bunch of flow problems<\/blockquote>some changed~ thanks for checking xD just realized it went to graveyard gg<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n MisterDinner<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 107 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n MisterDinner<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-08-09T15:46:11+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n 10nya wrote:<\/h4>just realized it went to graveyard gg<\/blockquote>Dont we alll go to the graveyard at some point.Damn thats depressing.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Okoayu<\/a>\n\n \n Nomination Assessment Team\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 5,010 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Okoayu<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-12-12T02:02:54+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n yeah only took like half a year[general]combo 1 is much darker than the rest making it harder to read over this dark bg and complete black, would suggest making it brighter works[map]00:05:938 (1,2) - i don't see what's different here from the previous measures, why suddenly twice as many circles ah no wait i see it, but that way <\/li>00:15:462 (3) - makes less sense as it's the same thing<\/li>00:14:192 (2,1) - this comes out of nowhere and doesn't really do anything it's not indicated or anything so idk i can't make sense of as to why you do that<\/li>00:24:668 (4,1,2) - thiss doesn't make sense with the way you did rhythm before (00:22:287 (5) - 00:23:557 (5) - ) besides 00:25:144 (2) - isn't really helping achieve anything<\/li>00:26:255 (1) - might want to have this stand out through either breaking flow or spacing<\/li>00:28:636 (5,1,2) - crtl+g ing rhythm here would make way more sense with what the song does and what your map usually does for this<\/li>00:32:446 (6,1,2) - similar thing, just not with the reverse at this pint imma just say this applies to most of the intro lol<\/li>00:33:239 (3,4) - 00:35:779 (3,4) - song is constantly picking up pace in this part but you alternate between sliders and not sliders<\/li>00:41:176 (2,3,4,5,1) - the cutoff from stream to slider doesn't look very neat mostly due to the sliders shape not complimenting anything the stream did<\/li>00:56:890 (4) - would make more sense as just circles i think<\/li>01:00:541 (1) - should not go back over itself (which it kinda does now)<\/li>01:20:065 (3,4) - would be more expected to be stacked<\/li>01:20:700 (1,2) - doing something like https:\/\/puu.sh\/sMpt5\/59c24ed929.png<\/a> would make way more sense with what's happening in the song and what's happened in the map so far, alternatively you should maybe also reconsider ending 01:20:224 (4) - in the same sound you had clicked at 01:18:001 (4) - <\/li>01:22:287 (2) - same <\/li>01:24:033 - 01:24:351 - not clicking these goes against everything you established with 01:08:795 (1,2) - 01:11:335 (1,2) - 01:13:874 (1,2,3,4) - <\/li>01:16:414 (1,2,3,4) - <\/li>01:25:938 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - music isn't suggesting groups of 3, it's doing three groups of two instead so emphasis should be on each white tick ideally<\/li>01:29:906 (2,3) - not too much a fan of these for known reasons<\/li>01:42:446 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - represent the song much better, the rest of this section kinda doesn't do that though<\/li>01:48:319 (4) - 01:49:589 (4) - i don't hear anything that would suggest anything being held, playing these in this part kinda doesn't fit anything<\/li>02:33:239 (1,2) - playing these or any others of this is kinda uncomfortable because the way you simplified them they play like an 1\/3 pattern with a weird cutoff at the end <\/li>02:45:620 - extends seem kinda unnecessary for this but i guess that's preference<\/li>03:08:477 (5,6) - doesn't really reflect what's happening music wise<\/li>03:22:762 (1,2,3,4) - 03:23:715 (6,7) - should be way more similar since they represent the same<\/li>03:51:810 (3) - music doesn't suggest this, kinda overmappwed for no reason<\/li>03:53:080 (3) - could leave 1\/4 delay between sliders like this if they're followed by objects, would make interpreting them less mean for players<\/li>03:56:096 - would prefer clicking this as it's quite essential to the song but not represented in the map<\/li>04:31:334 (6,1,2) - 04:34:032 (1,2) - 04:35:620 (4) - why do you suddenly switch to red ticks nothing really suggests this ;_;<\/li><\/ol>most of the problems i have with this are things that just dont really represent what the song is putting emphasis on through rhythm, my willingness to push this further basically depends on how you go about addressing the fundamental things (read as rhythm things i pointed out and generalised)a few parts of this work pretty well so i'd hope to push this<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Xinely<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 5,014 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Xinely<\/a>\n\n \n 2016-12-12T02:13:50+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n go go beb <3entah dah brp lama ini map sampe udah ga ada di osu gw lagi<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n 10nya<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,746 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n 4n6d44