{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n kisata<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 521 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed September 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n kisata<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-29T22:20:14+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n maybe alternate wordingMetadata should be obtained only from the official site of the artist or publisher of the work and\/or released CD Cases and Scans.<\/strong> Database sites such as VGMDB and sites such as iTunes or Amazon are not reputable sources for metadata.<\/div>iTunes\/Amazon aren't considered to be official?<\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n Last edited by kisata<\/a> 2014-08-29T22:25:00+00:00<\/time>, edited 1 time in total.\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lanturn<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,912 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lanturn<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-29T22:24:54+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n They aren't considered official, as they only provide s. Even if the official site has allowed them to sell their product.Also, I love your wording. I'm going to swap to yours.Edit: removed the \"considered to be\" part <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n Last edited by Lanturn<\/a> 2014-08-29T22:31:20+00:00<\/time>, edited 1 time in total.\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n kisata<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 521 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed September 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n kisata<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-29T22:29:30+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I'd maybe remove the \"considered to be\" part. The rule's intent should come across as clear as possible and it's just a bit of extra word fluff.edit: okay you got it ha<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Garven<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 5,857 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed January 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Garven<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-29T23:13:01+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Could we have a hierarchy as far as the decision process? So Website > CD Print? I've seen misprints on CDs enough that I'd weigh in favor of the website as it is more dynamic.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n You did your best. Was I helpful for you?I am deeply grateful to you.<\/em><\/span>My maps<\/a> I sell moe<\/a>.-Garven<\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lanturn<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,912 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lanturn<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-29T23:38:03+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I agree we should choose either CD print or Website as a priority (preferably website) Some examples are (most famously) IGNITE (TV Size) (Website) \/ IGNITE (TV size ver.) (Scan) vsAnother example is this: p\/3281468<\/a> in which I would prefer to use the Album's title because of how 'ugly' the title is on the official sites.I'm fine with either having a set in stone rule, or allowing BATS\/Players choose. Of course I'm leaning towards the former.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lust<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,667 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed January 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Lust<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-30T05:23:58+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n do we have to list where we get our metadata from now on or somethingwhy make this a rule? if the metadata is wrong then a modder will point it out anyway and it will be fixedsounds better as a guideline, but even that i am still iffy aboutwho cares where a person gets their data from. its like researching information for a paper, the professors usually dont care where you find it - as long as you can make a good case for it you should be fine (here, the good case would be correct metadata and the players would be the professors)<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/center><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n WingSilent<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,982 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n WingSilent<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-30T06:57:03+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Lust wrote:<\/h4>why make this a rule? if the metadata is wrong then a modder will point it out anyway and it will be fixedsounds better as a guideline<\/blockquote>Yes. This must be a guideline, for sure.<\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n ~~~~~~ is back<\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Lach<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,118 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Lach<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-30T07:00:20+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Why does this matter? I'd rather everything be labelled under a single uniform abbreviation, than see \"Anime Size ver.\" or \"xXxANiME420VERSiONxXx\", because that's the kind of shit that will be next.You care so much about something that doesn't even make the map better. If you want to make a difference, try actually modding maps instead of posting screenshots of a cd cover scan.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n DakeDekaane<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,500 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed February 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n DakeDekaane<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-30T09:38:38+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I'm firmly standing in a position for banishing any label like this.We'll be consistent regardless of how the OST\/single states, late releases, impatient mappers, etc.. And I doubt it'll break anything as it's the same song after all.But this is another topic so don't mind me \\o3o\/<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Please mod\/nom: Aoi - c.s.q.n.<\/a> | Fuki - Zekkai no Juliet<\/a>. I have cookies! ;w;<\/strong><\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n xxdeathx<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,661 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n 5z5r4u