{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Stompy_<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 929 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2020<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Stompy_<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-04T20:00:10+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I feel like this is not needed as if a BN wanted they can go ahead and ask.+ we have a way to ask other BNs for anything we are unsure ofalso, one BN having less risk is bound to create problems since BNs will always prefer going 2nd instead of first regardless of how confident they are instead of it being equal I don't believe just because a map has been vetod with 1 BN nom that it would cause any less stress or less interaction from the community as the mapper and that BN are still affected by it which brings it back to the previous point of only 2nd BN benefitting from this which does not seem fair or equalSeems to overcomplicate qualifying a map in my opinion.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n Last edited by Stompy_<\/a> 2025-05-04T20:06:48+00:00<\/time>, edited 2 times in total.\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Damaree<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 635 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2015<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Damaree<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-05T00:40:53+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n its an ups and downsfor ups that I can think: its less frustrating. As what stated in proposal, some\/most mappers always gets 2nd BN and take more than months to get 1st one(most likely not confident with the map)for the downs: the map quality. Having only 1 BN to qualify tends to have a room of errors specially when there's no 2nd BN to re-check everything( tho there are some several ways for this to solve via re-check during qualify section and from BN server )but this proposal sounds interesting...<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Drum-Hitnormal<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,765 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Drum-Hitnormal<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-05T00:50:45+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Damaree wrote:<\/h4>its an ups and downsfor ups that I can think: its less frustrating. As what stated in proposal, some\/most mappers always gets 2nd BN and take more than months to get 1st one(most likely not confident with the map)for the downs: the map quality. Having only 1 BN to qualify tends to have a room of errors specially when there's no 2nd BN to re-check everything( tho there are some several ways for this to solve via re-check during qualify section and from BN server )but this proposal sounds interesting...<\/blockquote>the final quality of map is increased, cuz u spend more time in qualify and thus get more , and still require 2 BN to nom<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Worthlessnut9<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 354 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2021<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Worthlessnut9<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-05T01:15:54+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I think if the pending page sorted by number of nominations as a default would be as effective imo. Maybe give maps that have a single nomination a leaderboard since that's the appeal of the qualified section aside from the visibility, tho is wouldn't not argue for or against that idea<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Drum-Hitnormal<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,765 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Drum-Hitnormal<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-05T01:18:51+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Worthlessnut9 wrote:<\/h4>I think if the pending page sorted by number of nominations as a default would be as effective imo. Maybe give maps that have a single nomination a leaderboard since that's the appeal of the qualified section aside from the visibility, tho is wouldn't not argue for or against that idea<\/blockquote>im aware of this but lot of players are not aware of this, rather have a better system for visibility, even if you sort it by default, its still pending section and players just dont care about that section.leaderboard is to help with PP concern veto<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Worthlessnut9<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 354 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2021<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Worthlessnut9<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-05T01:39:33+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n maybe have maps that have 1 nomination still say pending but sort into the qualified section, what do you think of that?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Drum-Hitnormal<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,765 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2011<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Drum-Hitnormal<\/a>\n\n \n 2025-05-05T01:42:34+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Worthlessnut9 wrote:<\/h4>maybe have maps that have 1 nomination still say pending but sort into the qualified section, what do you think of that?<\/blockquote>i dont like the pending status, its confusing with the other pending map with 0 nom, maybe alpha? and current qualify is beta?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n RandomeLoL<\/a>\n\n \n Nomination Assessment Team\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 288 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed September 2015<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n 5f5q6