{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Zare<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,512 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed March 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Zare<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-08-21T23:03:03+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Notconvincedabout many of the thingsbut the map is still better than the majority of stuff out there soooo<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Kaguya Hourain<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 514 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Kaguya Hourain<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-11-24T17:10:42+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Ugh idk let's try this. General<\/span><\/strong><\/span>Why undeadbananaz in tags?<\/li><\/ol><\/div> Legend<\/span><\/strong><\/span>00:03:424 (2,3,4) - The first two beats are identical in the way you are mapping them so I would suggest something like this<\/a> or even stacking the first 2 beats.<\/li>00:06:224 (3,4) - Not really sure if these were supposed to go from down up or from up down. Downwards motion would feel better if you ask me.<\/li>00:11:824 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Not sure why you changed from stacks to this.<\/li>00:20:424 (6) - Feels weird being just a 1\/1 slider. I'd like it more if you followed the vocals here by adding a circle on the red tick and making a 1\/2 slider in the white afterwards.<\/li>00:52:424 (9,10) - Would feel better if you also followed the vocals here and reversed the order of these two in the timeline. If you feel the drum gets ignored by being in the sliderend I would suggest to turn the slider into a couple of circles.<\/li>01:30:824 (4,5) - Not sure why you mapped the slider on the white tick when the guitar sound and<\/strong> the vocal starts on the red one before it.<\/li>01:32:424 (4,5) - Same as above.<\/li>02:01:824 (4) - I don't think this slider fits here, try 2 circles instead.<\/li>02:25:224 (6,7,8,9) - Wow that's pretty confusing. I like it!<\/li>02:45:590 (2,3,4) - Not sure why the triple is there if all you're gonna do is make it inaudible :\/<\/li>03:07:423 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - There's nothing really that indicates the increase in spacing of these. It just feels like a continuous flow of 1\/4 drumhits not sure if it should be like this.<\/li>I love the second kiai very nice!<\/li>06:03:285 (1) - I'm actually not sure if x0,10 SV change is even rankable o.O<\/li>I feel the second half of the final kiai is stronger than the first. Adding some triples and increasing spacing a bit would add to that feel imo.<\/li><\/ol><\/div>As expected, this map is amazing, kd me so I can throw my stars into this already XD<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Mazzerin<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 493 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Mazzerin<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-11-29T18:28:41+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Kaguya Hourain wrote:<\/h4> General<\/span><\/strong><\/span>Why undeadbananaz in tags?<\/li><\/ol><\/div><\/blockquote>http:\/\/puu.sh\/dakdt\/c2320b68c7.png<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n EncoreW<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 833 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed June 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n EncoreW<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-12-17T16:05:15+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Too hard for me LOL.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n theltp535\n <\/span>\n \n \n \n \n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n theltp535<\/span>\n\n \n 2014-12-17T16:09:51+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Nice map, idk how to give u a star, i don't use forum, but ok<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Avishay<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,250 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Avishay<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-01-03T15:43:13+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n As requested![Legend]00:20:424 (6) - Why not follow the vocals here like you did previously? This slider ends on no beat so it doesn't contribute that much either, I suggest making it a 1\/2 slider (or 2 circles) and to remove the Inherited point that lowers the volume.<\/li>00:37:424 (1,2) - They're not 100% identical, and I think they should be.<\/li>00:39:024 (1,2,3) - Stack properly.<\/li>00:46:424 (9,10,1) - You can make this part a bit more enjoyable (in my opinion, at least) by using CTRL+G on 9 then CTRL+G again on 10 and 1 together.<\/li>00:56:624 (1,2) - Stack properly.<\/li>00:57:224 (3,4) - ^<\/li>01:03:024 (1,2) - ^<\/li>01:03:624 (3,4) - ^<\/li>01:29:224 (4,5) - Not sure if it is intentional, but you can probably blanket it <\/li>From 01:22:224 to 01:47:824, there are parts that you follow the vocals and some parts' vocals are getting mixed inside the sliders or ignored, try to make it a bit more consistent.<\/li>01:54:824 (5,1) - Stack them?<\/li>02:11:424 (7,2) - Stack properly.<\/li>02:25:424 (7,8,9) - Increase spacing or at least put a NC, you are inconsiderate of the player.<\/li>02:34:757 (1,4) - Stack properly.<\/li>Why not add note at 02:44:173 and 02:44:257? You can stack them with 02:44:090 (4) - and it goes nicely.<\/li>04:15:022 (6,7) - I think you should give priority to the irregular sound and start a slider with it on 6, since the timing point 7 starts, a slider unfits there and sounds a bit weird. (Slider 8 is great)<\/li>04:21:689 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - I'd love CTRL+G on every second slider, since the movement from side to side is much more fun than the current linear pattern.<\/li>04:47:522 (2,3) - Stack properly.<\/li>04:51:856 (11) - NC? 10 and 12 stack so I think a NC here is necessary to make it look a bit less messy.<\/li>04:57:689 (4,5,6) - Stack properly.<\/li>05:00:856 (7) - Why did you start following the (whatever kind of instrument it is) sound in the middle of it? Either don't follow it or start it at 05:00:356 (5) - it will feel much better.<\/li>05:29:356 (7) - CTRL+G for two reasons: A small jump for the strong vocal start, and it plays really nicely with the whole pattern.<\/li>05:31:022 (1,2,3) - Stack properly.<\/li>05:32:356 (7,8,9) - ^<\/li>05:36:356 (9,10,11) - ^<\/li>05:43:272 (4,1) - Stack them.<\/li>05:52:189 (4,5) - I think the blanket can be improved a bit here.<\/li>06:03:153 - Are you allowed to use 0.1x on the inherited point? You can't do that using the editor and this is in the Ranking Criteria - Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor.<\/blockquote>So you should probably just lower the BPM to get such low SV (Like at Image Material).<\/li>06:29:147 (3,4) - They're not 100% identical.<\/li>06:54:347 (6,7,8) - Stack properly.<\/li>07:02:147 (6,1) - ^<\/li>07:02:747 (1) - I think you should CTRL+G, since I think it plays better and to be consistent with the next pattern (07:04:347 (5,6) -)<\/li>07:12:947 (2,4) - You can improve the blanket.<\/li>07:24:347 (1) - NC?<\/li>07:26:347 (7,3) - Stack properly.<\/li>07:53:347 (7,1) - ^<\/li>07:58:747 (1,2) - This is pretty absurd.. I think this is the first 1\/6 slider in the map? It is really unpredictable and you should reduce the spacing, or at least change 2 to a slider.<\/li>08:08:547 (4) - CTRL+G for overall better pattern. <\/li><\/ol>Good luck Jenny!<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n EncoreW<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 833 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed June 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n EncoreW<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-01-19T17:26:02+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n OMG that's too hard I always dead in 1 minute !<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Aka<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 1,777 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed January 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Aka<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-03-02T15:29:20+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n postreserving i suppose<\/del>so!i had a short talk with desperate-kun and we discussed some things. the map is pretty good now, but:\u30fbwhy all of that effort on sliderticks? you could simply use silent slidertick as you are not using silent sliderslide silencing all ticks makes kinda no sense with tick rate 2. consider using tr1? this will also prevent forced sliderbreaks from this slider 06:03:285 (1) - since you just literally has 1st slidertick in the starting circle. and the sv could be a bit higher at least but uhhhhh it will break your neat looking of slider ;_;<\/span>and what caught my personal eye: \u30fb07:51:947 (6) - i am pretty sure this slider goes offscreen<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div>\u30fb01:35:004 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part was pretty late by timing for some reason. its greatly noticeable there 01:41:424 (1) - and on sliders\/notes previously. i am not really good in timing, but if to play objects from there on 1\/16 grey ticks, it would sounds better. maybe this calm part needs an addidional timing point?\u30fbprobably the epilepsy warning is needed here? o.o due to those white bursts at ~50% of the diff\u30fb04:51:689 (9) - if possible, would be better if you could make the emphazis on this note, if the shape of slider started to change from 9 (or from 13 ), not from 04:51:856 (11) - , it would be more natural to play, since 9 is on white tick and having such stuff started from stronger beat is way better to play than from weaker one\u30fb05:03:939 (8,9) - this will be pain in ass to catch ._... if this 05:03:022 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - structure could be placed a bit down and 9 from 05:03:856 (7,8,9) - would be placed between 8 and 9, instead of 10, i believer it would be a bit less pain to catch and well, overall more comfortable to follow<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div>\u30fb06:41:547 (2,3,4,5,6) - 06:47:947 (2,3,4,5) - the same recommendation will go here from me when you caught me ingame, these objects are barely hearable\u30fb07:24:347 (9) - same as 04:51:689 (9) - here. i was always mes on such thing, honestly.. if 9 was more below, like 8 is placed now, it would much more natural to follow. i could suggest adding 1 note before the 07:23:547 (1) - , so placement changing wont need any effortyou can count on my bubububbubbble, so poke me when its ready uwu<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n Last edited by Aka<\/a> 2015-03-05T13:46:04+00:00<\/time>, edited 2 times in total.\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n Artorias_DELETED\n <\/span>\n \n \n \n \n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Artorias_DELETED<\/span>\n\n \n 2015-03-02T21:20:59+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Good luck jen!!<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Doguu<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 114 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed September 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Doguu<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-03-03T22:45:30+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Beatmap so goooooooooood<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Jenny<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 2,200 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2010<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Jenny<\/a>\n\n \n 2015-03-06T14:50:39+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Aka wrote:<\/h4>\u30fbwhy all of that effort on sliderticks? you could simply use silent slidertick as you are not using silent sliderslide silencing all ticks makes kinda no sense with tick rate 2. consider using tr1? this will also prevent forced sliderbreaks from this slider 06:03:285 (1) - since you just literally has 1st slidertick in the starting circle. and the sv could be a bit higher at least but uhhhhh it will break your neat looking of slider ;_; | actually I have yet to see anyone break on the long trainsqueak slider; they usually overwing at the start but breaking doesn't really happen - also, how'd tick 1 help with that? - I like TR2 since it gives you a visual when there's something going on on the weaker beats, without needing the audio impact. you know there's a 1\/2 drum rhythm most of the time, so it's reassuring to see something being there and the numbers ticking up on it, but having the kind of \"snazzy\" ticksound (which quite frankly is just annoying) would just feel dissonant in the song. I don't want it \/entirely\/ gone but I prefer to have it near-unnoticably in the background, if that makes sense<\/span><\/span>and what caught my personal eye: \u30fb07:51:947 (6) - i am pretty sure this slider goes offscreen<\/span>SPOILER<\/a> 1o3k6d