{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n NemousuSP<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 45 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed May 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n NemousuSP<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-06-09T05:55:15+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n lordraika wrote:<\/h4>Request Mod from Lightning Speed Mania Modding<\/a><\/strong>Column |1-7|<\/span>Full Mod Inside<\/a>[General][Nessienya~ HD]00:28:508 - add 1 LN herechanged<\/span>01:08:438 - convert the notes into LN or add 1 LN no<\/span> 01:26:396 - ^\u3000no<\/span>thank you mod!<\/div><\/div><\/blockquote><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n IamKwaN<\/a>\n\n \n osu! Alumni\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 3,905 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n IamKwaN<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-06-10T13:01:17+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Hi, from my queue here<\/a>. General<\/h2>First of all, you need to reduce your background size. It's currently 1.30 mb with a .png format. Convert it to a .jpg file and help reduce the size efficiently.<\/span><\/strong><\/li>Haha, would your Hard diff be more consistent with others if it's renamed to 'Nuked's Hardnya'?<\/strong><\/li>Better use custom combo colors to match the background color.<\/strong><\/li>I am doubtful about the song's title and artist. Is there an official source? Coz I can't find one on web orz... Instead, I find something from here<\/a>, but none of them matches with your song.<\/strong><\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ol><\/div>Insane<\/h2>For streams, I prefer using 'Convert this slider into stream' function to maintain a consistent spacing of streams, coz I saw many of them are on and off with much error, for example, 00:13:931 (3).<\/li>00:06:748 (7) - This is 1\/8 snap instead of 1\/12, 4 dings instead of 6.<\/li>00:14:353 (6) - ^<\/li>00:14:353 (6) - Does this beat sound heavy compared to other blue ticks? Add a circle here.<\/li>00:15:410 (2,4) - Stack these two, kinda obvious<\/li>00:19:001 (4,5,6,7) - It would be more consistent if you do a similar trick by using progressive spacing like 00:06:959 (1,2,3,4).<\/li>00:37:170 (1) - I don't know if this would violate this rule<\/a>, try ask a BAT!<\/li>00:39:283 (1) - Is this anti-jump intentional? Spreading it apart from previous sliders seems more comfortable to me though it has NC as an indicator already.<\/li>00:39:494 (3) - mentioned above, 1\/8 instead of 1\/12, same applies on 00:43:508 (1) - 00:45:410 (5) - 00:54:494 (3) - 01:03:156 (2) - 01:05:903 (4) - 01:08:438 (1) - 01:15:198 (5) - 01:18:579 (5) - <\/li>00:55:550 (1) - wow, this slider's shape really bothers me lol<\/li>00:56:818 (4,6) - Why not making them parallel like 00:56:607 (3,5)? Look more neat and aesthetic imo.<\/li>00:58:297 (1) - ;w; Can I mention the shape of slider again?<\/li>01:00:832 (1,2,3,4) - Personally, I think sliders can be applied here instead of 00:59:987 (1,2,3,4), the feeling sounds more appropriate.<\/li>01:23:015 (1) - Like 00:37:170 (1).<\/li>01:25:339 (1,2,3,4) - Are these worthwhile to have some NCs for noticing players of SV changes?<\/li>As for the hitsounds, where is S:C1? Or its just simply default sample?<\/li>01:25:339 (1) - Remove the finish on tail.<\/li>Last but not least, some personal comments on this diff. Anti-jumps make the arrangement crowding, for example, 00:22:170 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - 00:49:212 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7). Well, it's a feature of this diff, so just go ahead! Secondly, slider shapes are annoying, e.g. 00:27:029 (1). I strongly recommend you making them more beautiful by making good use of anchors.. ;_; Also, do not abuse usage of 1\/12, all streams should be 1\/8 snapped instead.<\/li><\/ol><\/div>Hard<\/h2>Frankly speaking, this diff consists of many 1\/4 jumps (00:20:691 (8,9)), some quartets like 00:53:015 (2,3,4,5). For this reason, the difficulty is kinda high imo. Consider reducing the star rating by using consistent spacing and decreasing numbers of harsh pattern like 00:38:015 (8,9,10,11,1). Usually, we can only find this kind of placements in Insane and we use reversed sliders instead in Hard.<\/li>00:20:691 (8,9) - DS is not consistent and it misleads players to hit it as 1\/2 instead of 1\/4 comparing to spacing of 00:20:480 (7,8). This error happens quite a number of times throughout the whole diff, for example, 00:23:015 (5,6) - 00:26:184 (4,5,6,7,8). Okay, I stop spamming you on this, you can check them yourself one by one.<\/li>00:40:128 (4,5,6) - With such short and different reversed sliders, it's very difficult for players to be aware of. Also, the stresses are on 00:40:550 and 00:40:973. My recommendation is to use slider heads on these stresses like this:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>00:45:832 (2,3) - Improve this blanket a bit.<\/li>00:51:536 (10,11,12) - Kinda crowded and somehow difficult to read the reversed sign. Rotate it clockwise like this:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:05:374 (11) - Drum stress on 01:05:480 but not on blue tick, change it in this way:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:11:712 (9) - Similar to above, separate it into two reversed sliders with heads lying on white ticks at 01:11:818 and 01:12:241. Add a circle at 01:11:712 too.<\/li>01:29:565 (10) - You may want to NC here even it's the last note.<\/li>Keep the clap pattern consistent, I saw you add claps sometimes on 2nd white tick only, sometimes only 4th, sometimes even both. Is there any implication behind?<\/li>00:18:579 (1) - finish on head?<\/li>The song itself is monotonous and pattern of finishes and claps can be quite straightforward, like claps on 2nd and 4th white ticks, finishes on 1st tick. Take a look at Insane and you can find something useful!<\/li><\/ol><\/div>Normal<\/h2>00:22:804 (2,3,4,5,6) - Quite harsh in normal in the sense that note density is too high. I suggest reducing it:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:16:888 (3,4,5,6,7) - ^ Sacrifice some rhythm to make it easier, don't forget to NC on 01:19:424, for example:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:26:184 (6) - NC here and remove that on 01:28:086 (1), coz what you did is NCing every two white ticks.<\/li>Similar to Insane, there's large room for improvement of slider shape. Personally, I don't prefer shapes like 00:10:128 (4) and 00:35:903 (2). Something like 00:40:550 (5) is good, but there's still space to adjust positions of anchors to make it symmetric and tidy.<\/li><\/ol><\/div>Easy<\/h2>00:27:874 (5,1) - Stack them perfectly.<\/li>00:51:959 (6) - Improve the flow by altering the direction of curvature:<\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li>01:29:565 (7) - You may want to NC here even it's the last note.<\/li><\/ol><\/div>Good luck! <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Midge<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 476 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed December 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Midge<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-06-11T06:39:05+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Brb finals<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Akasha-<\/a>\n\n \n Nomination Assessment Team\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 4,422 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed April 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Akasha-<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-06-13T14:48:38+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n NaxelCL wrote:<\/h4>Nya from the team modding queue with Remillion Cross : t\/211443<\/a>[KKnya~ EZ]01:08:860 - changed to normal note ~ more fit with the song It fine, no thanks<\/span><\/strong>Fine.<\/strong>Go go go go for rank.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! , I'm shoot a star , good luck!<\/blockquote>Thanks for modding, NaxelCL >w<No changed!<\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Midge<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 476 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed December 2012<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Midge<\/a>\n\n \n 2014-06-15T03:19:43+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n IamKwaN wrote:<\/h4>Hi, from my queue here<\/a>. General<\/h2>First of all, you need to reduce your background size. It's currently 1.30 mb with a .png format. Convert it to a .jpg file and help reduce the size efficiently.<\/span><\/strong> will do<\/span><\/li>Haha, would your Hard diff be more consistent with others if it's renamed to 'Nuked's Hardnya'?<\/strong> nah, gd's have the nya in the name<\/span><\/li>Better use custom combo colors to match the background color.<\/strong> will do<\/span><\/li>I am doubtful about the song's title and artist. Is there an official source? Coz I can't find one on web orz... Instead, I find something from here<\/a>, but none of them matches with your song.<\/strong> ive been told it's what i have, so no :S<\/span><\/span>SPOILER<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ol><\/div>Insane<\/h2>For streams, I prefer using 'Convert this slider into stream' function to maintain a consistent spacing of streams, coz I saw many of them are on and off with much error, for example, 00:13:931 (3). <\/li>00:06:748 (7) - This is 1\/8 snap instead of 1\/12, 4 dings instead of 6.done<\/span><\/li>00:14:353 (6) - ^ done<\/span><\/li>00:14:353 (6) - Does this beat sound heavy compared to other blue ticks? Add a circle here. wha<\/span><\/li>00:15:410 (2,4) - Stack these two, kinda obvious done<\/span><\/li>00:19:001 (4,5,6,7) - It would be more consistent if you do a similar trick by using progressive spacing like 00:06:959 (1,2,3,4). fine as is<\/span><\/li>00:37:170 (1) - I don't know if this would violate this rule<\/a>, try ask a BAT! asked a bat, they said it was ok<\/span><\/li>00:39:283 (1) - Is this anti-jump intentional? Spreading it apart from previous sliders seems more comfortable to me though it has NC as an indicator already. moved a little<\/span><\/li>00:39:494 (3) - mentioned above, 1\/8 instead of 1\/12, same applies on 00:43:508 (1) - 00:45:410 (5) - 00:54:494 (3) - 01:03:156 (2) - 01:05:903 (4) - 01:08:438 (1) - 01:15:198 (5) - 01:18:579 (5) - all fixed, thanks for finding these T~T<\/span><\/li>00:55:550 (1) - wow, this slider's shape really bothers me lol fixed, wanted to keep the curve to emphasize the sound though<\/span><\/li>00:56:818 (4,6) - Why not making them parallel like 00:56:607 (3,5)? Look more neat and aesthetic imo. points back to the initial circle<\/span><\/li>00:58:297 (1) - ;w; Can I mention the shape of slider again? fine imo<\/span><\/li>01:00:832 (1,2,3,4) - Personally, I think sliders can be applied here instead of 00:59:987 (1,2,3,4), the feeling sounds more appropriate.<\/li>01:23:015 (1) - Like 00:37:170 (1). nah<\/span><\/li>01:25:339 (1,2,3,4) - Are these worthwhile to have some NCs for noticing players of SV changes? 4g1c4s