{"content":"\n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Aranel<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 477 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed January 2017<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Aranel<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-16T21:59:58+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n +1<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n lost all faith in humanity<\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Mr Business<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 219 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed November 2016<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Mr Business<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-16T22:26:06+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I must be seriously mising things cause I thought we changed this years ago? Regardless +1<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n subahibi<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 133 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2017<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n subahibi<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T00:29:31+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n +1<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Sophie Twilight<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 532 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed October 2019<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Sophie Twilight<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T00:35:08+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n This allows more creative sliders in ranked+1<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n UberFazz<\/a>\n\n \n Medal Hunter\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 163 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed July 2016<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n UberFazz<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T04:19:52+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n was considering a different approach before making the github pr: putting the current rule under \"Rules\" section of per-difficulty rules for e\/n\/h and the updated rule under \"Guidelines\" for i\/xvs the other approach of just directly modifying the current rulesince this is only really an issue for top diffs, i believe the per-difficulty approach is the best one but want more opinions first<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n Dignan<\/a>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 245 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed June 2014<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Dignan<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T07:54:33+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Good point on low diffs, those should certainly be categorically excluded<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n AJT<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 571 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n AJT<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T09:12:16+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n UberFazz wrote:<\/h4>was considering a different approach before making the github pr: putting the current rule under \"Rules\" section of per-difficulty rules for e\/n\/h and the updated rule under \"Guidelines\" for i\/xvs the other approach of just directly modifying the current rulesince this is only really an issue for top diffs, i believe the per-difficulty approach is the best one but want more opinions first<\/blockquote>just writing here that I Agree cus we already concluded this together in dms last night<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n I've been Southampton but I've never been to Scunthorpe.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n Jade Harley<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 329 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed January 2017<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Jade Harley<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T09:13:35+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n +2. Also yes making this a difficulty-based guideline makes sense to me.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n AJT<\/a>\n\n \n Beatmap Nominator\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/a>\n\n \n <\/i>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n \n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n \n \n 571 posts\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n \n ed August 2013<\/strong>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n \n \n \n Topic Starter\n <\/span>\n <\/div>\n \n \n AJT<\/a>\n\n \n 2021-10-17T09:19:36+00:00<\/time>\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n \n Let me paste the full sketch for clarity (draft)Easy, Normal, Hard, under rules<\/em>: Every slider must have a clear and visible path of movement to follow from start to end. Sliders that overlap themselves without straightforward slider borders and sliders whose individual sections are unreadable cannot be used. A slider's end position must be clear under the assumption that a player has a skin which makes slider end circles fully transparent.<\/pre>i.e. the same rule as currently, but just applied to low diffs only. Insane and up under guidelines<\/em>: 3d696m